1994
DOI: 10.1039/ft9949000587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic model for serum albumin adsorption : experimental verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
61
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To see why this is so, we consider the picture of partially reversible protein adsorption in which molecules initially attach in a reversible manner (with a structure similar to that in solution) and subsequently undergo an irreversible transition to a conformationally or orientationally altered structure possessing a greater degree of surface contact (16,35). Within this picture, steric blocking of the transition prevents some of the molecules from becoming irreversibly bound; this explains observations of (i) a removal of only a certain fraction of adsorbed proteins during dilution of the bulk phase and (ii) an increase in maximal surface coverage with protein bulk concentration (36,37). Based on this picture, one expects that the kinetics of a second adsorption step would be slower because of transitions of some of the proteins during the rinse, leading to a more efficiently blocked surface and a diminishment of the area available for subsequent protein adsorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To see why this is so, we consider the picture of partially reversible protein adsorption in which molecules initially attach in a reversible manner (with a structure similar to that in solution) and subsequently undergo an irreversible transition to a conformationally or orientationally altered structure possessing a greater degree of surface contact (16,35). Within this picture, steric blocking of the transition prevents some of the molecules from becoming irreversibly bound; this explains observations of (i) a removal of only a certain fraction of adsorbed proteins during dilution of the bulk phase and (ii) an increase in maximal surface coverage with protein bulk concentration (36,37). Based on this picture, one expects that the kinetics of a second adsorption step would be slower because of transitions of some of the proteins during the rinse, leading to a more efficiently blocked surface and a diminishment of the area available for subsequent protein adsorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…One example is the so called 'catalysis of desorption' by adsorbed neighbors primarily observed by Kurrat et al which accounts for rising desorption rates at higher surface coverages [139]. Further, even though mechanistically somewhat different, it has been shown that proteins approaching the surface may hit other pre-adsorbed proteins which, as a result, are released from the surface [10,140].…”
Section: Lateral Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Levich, 1962); under typical experimental conditions W d « 100 fim. k d may be more complicated than a simple first-order rate constant if lateral interactions are taken into account (Kurrat et al 1993). k a and k s depend on energy barriers impeding adsorption; k a refers to reversibly adsorbed molecules, and k s to irreversibly adsorbed ones.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Kinetic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%