2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic extractions to assess mobilization of Zn, Pb, Cu, and Cd in a metal-contaminated soil: EDTA vs. citrate

Abstract: Kinetic EDTA and citrate extractions were used to mimic metal mobilization in a soil contaminated by metallurgical fallout. Modeling of metal removal rates vs. time distinguished two metal pools: readily labile (QM1) and less labile (QM2). In citrate extractions, total extractability (QM1+QM2) of Zn and Cd was proportionally higher than for Pb and Cu. Proportions of Pb and Cu extracted with EDTA were three times higher than when using citrate. We observed similar QM1/QM2 ratios for Zn and Cu regardless of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
73
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kinetic extractions were performed using a solution of EDTA at 0.05 mol·L −1 with 13 contact times ranging from 15 min to 24 h and a L:S ratio of 10:1. EDTA is used as extractant because it is non-specific (only cations) and can therefore mobilise a large number of elements; it is also capable of extracting metal bound to organic matter, carbonate and Fe and Mn oxides providing good long-term prediction of metal bioaccessibility from these different sediment phases (Gismera et al (2004); Labanowski et al (2008)). Three replicate extractions of each extraction procedure were undertaken.…”
Section: Geochemical Analysis and Extraction Of The Raw And Treated Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinetic extractions were performed using a solution of EDTA at 0.05 mol·L −1 with 13 contact times ranging from 15 min to 24 h and a L:S ratio of 10:1. EDTA is used as extractant because it is non-specific (only cations) and can therefore mobilise a large number of elements; it is also capable of extracting metal bound to organic matter, carbonate and Fe and Mn oxides providing good long-term prediction of metal bioaccessibility from these different sediment phases (Gismera et al (2004); Labanowski et al (2008)). Three replicate extractions of each extraction procedure were undertaken.…”
Section: Geochemical Analysis and Extraction Of The Raw And Treated Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supernatant was filtered and analysed by inductively-coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES; Varian Vista MPX). This method is known to extract the 'labile' and 'less labile' pools of trace elements (Fangueiro et al 2005;Labanowski et al 2008), i.e. the mineral fraction potentially available to plants via root absorption.…”
Section: Plant and Soil Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have hypothesized that the application of models with metals extraction data might better reflect behaviors of metals in soils [1][2][3][4][5]. For a given chemical extractant, the extraction method generates two kinds of data: (i) with respect to the total metals content, the proportion of extractable metals in the soil sample; and (ii) the dynamics of metals [6]. In view of the effectiveness in removing a wide range of heavy metals, chelating or acidic agents are widely applied as extractants [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%