2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707061104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic evidence for a ligand-binding-induced conformational transition in the T cell receptor

Abstract: Thermodynamics and kinetics of the interaction between T cell receptor specific for cytomegalovirus peptide (TCRCMV) and its specific ligand, pp65-HLA-A*0201 complex, were studied by surface plasmon resonance and stopped-flow methods. In the latter measurements, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between fluorescently labeled reactants was used. Thermodynamic data derived from surface plasmon resonance measurements suggest that the complex formation is driven by both favorable enthalpy and entropy. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A low affinity contact is considered more likely because, similar to peptide-devoid molecules, the flexibility of the binding groove helices is considerably enhanced when a peptide is only loosely bound [34]. Some resemblance to the first stage of the 'two-step' model of TCR binding to a pMHC that has been proposed previously [47,48] is obvious for the envisaged recognition, but remains a matter of speculation, and it is equally uncertain whether pMHC complexes interact as homo-or heterodimers with TCR in thymic selection processes [49]. In line with commonly held ideas, negative selection within the medulla would finally lead to deletion of all those T cells that are self-MHC-restricted, but still exhibit high affinity towards MHC molecules presenting any of the large number of self-peptides that can be displayed on mTEC [6].…”
Section: Recognition Of Mhc Antigens By Tcr Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A low affinity contact is considered more likely because, similar to peptide-devoid molecules, the flexibility of the binding groove helices is considerably enhanced when a peptide is only loosely bound [34]. Some resemblance to the first stage of the 'two-step' model of TCR binding to a pMHC that has been proposed previously [47,48] is obvious for the envisaged recognition, but remains a matter of speculation, and it is equally uncertain whether pMHC complexes interact as homo-or heterodimers with TCR in thymic selection processes [49]. In line with commonly held ideas, negative selection within the medulla would finally lead to deletion of all those T cells that are self-MHC-restricted, but still exhibit high affinity towards MHC molecules presenting any of the large number of self-peptides that can be displayed on mTEC [6].…”
Section: Recognition Of Mhc Antigens By Tcr Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…An NMR study of the D10 TCR reported greater flexibility of the CDR3α and CDR3β loops in the picosecond time scale 12 . Stopped-flow kinetic measurements have shown that the interaction of a cytomegalovirus peptide-specific TCR with its ligand is rate-limited by an induced-fit mechanism, but the location and magnitude of the associated structural changes that occur during binding is unknown 13 . Thermodynamic studies have suggested that a number of TCRs must undergo conformational changes during binding (reviewed in ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even more intriguing and important, the study by Gakamsky et al (5) could provide a quantitative understanding of the difference between agonistic and antagonistic peptides presented by the same MHC. Another challenge for the future would be to measure the TCRpMHC interactions on the surface of living cells because that is where they are expressed and act in physiological situations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This landmark study by Gakamsky et al (5) should be a basis for future work to unravel in further detail the interactions between TCRs and their ligands. TCRs always bind pMHC in a similar, relative diagonal orientation (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%