1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-2427(98)00200-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic and immunohistochemical characteristics of mitogen-induced cutaneous hypersensitivity in chickens selected for antibody responsiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
53
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PHA first induces an acute response 4·h after injection, primarily characterised by oedema. Then it induces a delayed-type hypersensitivity response through stimulating heterophils, basophils, granulocytic and mononuclear cell infiltration in dermis and dense perivascular infiltration of T lymphocytes at the site of injection (Parmentier et al, 1998;Sharma, 1990). This late response generally peaks 18·h after injection, and may last up to 36·h.…”
Section: Data Collection and Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PHA first induces an acute response 4·h after injection, primarily characterised by oedema. Then it induces a delayed-type hypersensitivity response through stimulating heterophils, basophils, granulocytic and mononuclear cell infiltration in dermis and dense perivascular infiltration of T lymphocytes at the site of injection (Parmentier et al, 1998;Sharma, 1990). This late response generally peaks 18·h after injection, and may last up to 36·h.…”
Section: Data Collection and Experimental Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PHA first induces an acute response 4 h after injection, primarily characterised by oedema. Then a delayed-type hypersensitivity response is induced through stimulating heterophil, basophil, eosinophil, macrophage and thrombocyte cell infiltration in the dermis and dense perivascular infiltration of T-lymphocytes at the site of injection (Sharma, 1990;Parmentier et al, 1998;Martin et al, 2006). This late response generally peaks 18 h after injection and may last up to 36 h. This test therefore reflects the combined responses of T-cells, cytokines and inflammatory cells (Davison et al, 1996) and involves both innate and adaptive components of the immune system (Martin et al, 2006;Tella et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the wing web), and with the same amount of saline buffer, we tried to minimize variation between immune treatment groups in local inflammation as a direct result of tissue damage. We measured the thickness change at the injection site (a measure of the inflammatory response) 4.0 ± 0.1 h after an injection of LPS and 24.5 ± 0.3 h after an injection of PHA (Parmentier et al 1998;Smits et al 1999). The 4-h delay was chosen for LPS because it corresponds to the peak of the cutaneous response following an injection of LPS in domestic fowls (Gallus gallus domesticus; Parmentier et al 1998).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured the thickness change at the injection site (a measure of the inflammatory response) 4.0 ± 0.1 h after an injection of LPS and 24.5 ± 0.3 h after an injection of PHA (Parmentier et al 1998;Smits et al 1999). The 4-h delay was chosen for LPS because it corresponds to the peak of the cutaneous response following an injection of LPS in domestic fowls (Gallus gallus domesticus; Parmentier et al 1998). Likewise, the 24 h delay corresponds to a peak of the cutaneous response to PHA in chicken (Parmentier et al 1998) and house sparrows (Passer domesticus; Martin II et al 2003).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation