2017
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aa8e66
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic and finite ion mass effects on the transition to relativistic self-induced transparency in laser-driven ion acceleration

Abstract: We study kinetic effects responsible for the transition to relativistic self-induced transparency in the interaction of a circularly-polarized laser-pulse with an overdense plasma and their relation to holeboring (HB) and ion acceleration. It is demonstrated using particle-in-cell simulations and an analysis of separatrices in single-electron phase-space, that ion motion can suppress fast electron escape to the vacuum, which would otherwise lead to transition to the relativistic transparency regime. A simple a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 shows the distribution function for electrons at time t = 15T after the front of the laser pulse has reached the plasma, for the densities n e = 0.3n c (in the underdense plasma regime), n e = 1.5n c (in the SIT regime) and n e = 2.6n c (in the hole-boring regime). The n e = 0.3n c case is in the regime where the relativistic Raman and modulational instabilities merge [53,54] as evidenced by particle trapping and acceleration, the n e = 1.5n c case develops electron vortices on the front side which is in agreement with dynamics of the SIT regime [43,47,55] and the n e = 2.6n c is identified with characteristics of the hole-boring regime. The Figure also shows the distribution function calculated by the PIC code (grey) at the same instant of time.…”
Section: Comparison To Pic Simulations In Different Interaction Regimessupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4 shows the distribution function for electrons at time t = 15T after the front of the laser pulse has reached the plasma, for the densities n e = 0.3n c (in the underdense plasma regime), n e = 1.5n c (in the SIT regime) and n e = 2.6n c (in the hole-boring regime). The n e = 0.3n c case is in the regime where the relativistic Raman and modulational instabilities merge [53,54] as evidenced by particle trapping and acceleration, the n e = 1.5n c case develops electron vortices on the front side which is in agreement with dynamics of the SIT regime [43,47,55] and the n e = 2.6n c is identified with characteristics of the hole-boring regime. The Figure also shows the distribution function calculated by the PIC code (grey) at the same instant of time.…”
Section: Comparison To Pic Simulations In Different Interaction Regimessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…4.1, for semi-infinite plasma -a local density peak is formed at the plasma-vacuum interface, leading to a critical density departing from n eff c [41,42]. The situation is complicated by kinetic effects [43] and ion motion [46,47] and the threshold for transition from the transparent to the opaque regime has to be determined numerically. In particular, when ion motion effects are taken into account one studies the transition between SIT and the so-called hole-boring regime [48][49][50][51][52] in which the ions are accelerated in the charge-separation-induced electrostatic field and the whole plasma-vacuum interface recedes deeper into the plasma.…”
Section: Comparison To Pic Simulations In Different Interaction Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior can be explained by the fact that, as was noted previously [48][49][50][51], induced transparency at a sharp plasma boundary manifests itself in the appearance of electron beams breaking off towards the incident laser radiation. This is accompanied by a deeper penetration of the radiation into the plasma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…By contrast, using laser pulses with circular polarization (CP), for which the ponderomotive force does not show high-frequency oscillations, the j × B and vacuum heating mechanisms are essentially suppressed in overdense targets, and so is the fast electron bunch production (and the surface waves induced by them). Still, some fast electrons can be produced with CP if the variation time scale of the laser envelope is not large compared to the laser cycle (Siminos et al 2012(Siminos et al , 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%