2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic and equilibrium studies of phosphorous adsorption: Effect of physical and chemical properties of adsorption agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of the temperature on sorption capacity was more remarkable for CSW (57.3%) than CSW-T adsorbent (22.1%). The effect of the temperature for phosphate adsorption was also observed in the literature [31][32][33].…”
Section: Effect Of the Temperature On P Removalsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The effect of the temperature on sorption capacity was more remarkable for CSW (57.3%) than CSW-T adsorbent (22.1%). The effect of the temperature for phosphate adsorption was also observed in the literature [31][32][33].…”
Section: Effect Of the Temperature On P Removalsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…It appears that Fe is also effective in the stabilization of cadmium (Saffari et al, 2015). Oliveira et al (2015) observed high P removal ability in Fe-modified zeolite followed by Al-modified zeolite. Shanableh et al (2016) studied P adsorption using Al/Fe modified bentonite.…”
Section: Taguchi Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%
“…(2011) which is in agreement with results of a present study which demonstrated the significant role of NaOH in increasing P adsorption (Figure 1(d)). According to the results of Oliveira et al. (2015), zeolite was an efficient and promising adsorbent for P removal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wastewaters originating from cheese manufacturing industries, such as cheese whey (CW), second cheese whey (SCW), and washing waters, are of high-strength as they contain significant [14] Simulated swine wastewater Chemical modification with NaCl Ammonium 40%-95% [15] Dairy farm wastewater treated in constructed wetlands Natural Phosphorus Ammonium 86%-99% 88%-99% [16] Dairy industry wastewater Organo-zeolites COD Nitrate nitrogen Phosphate 50% 70% 20% [17] Dairy processing waters Natural COD 76% [18] Aqueous solution/carcass leachates Naturaland Mg 2+ modified Ammonium 8.173 mg/g 7.759 mg/g [19] Municipal wastewater Natural Ammonium 5.03 mg/g 75.6% [20] Aqueous solution Modified with fly ash Ammonium 41.73%-45.25% [21] Review of acid mine drainage urban runofflandfill leachate Natural/synthetic Heavy metals Zn (30%-95%)/Cu (33%-100%) Cd (54%-99%)/Cu (31%-90%)/Zn (81.892%)/Ammonium 78% Ammonium (over 50%)/Pb (71%)/Cd (74%) [22] Aqueous solution Natural Ammonium 22.90 mg/g [23] Aqueous solution Modified by microwave and sodium acetate Ammonium 92.90% [24] [25] Municipal wastewater Natural Modified (Z-Fe) Phosphate (single) Ammonium (single) Phosphate (single) Ammonium (single) 0.6 mg/g 33 mg/g 3.4 mg/g 27 mg/g [26] Aqueous solution Natural Modified with potassium permanganate Ammonium 5.85 mg/g 3.68 mg/g [27] Aqueous solution Modified with lanthanum oxide Phosphorus Ammonium 8.96 21.2 mg/g [28] Aqueous solution Natural Ammonium 67.4%-81.1% [29] Simulated reclaimed wastewater Modified with NaCl Ammonia, nitrogen Phosphorus 98.46% 99.8% [30] Aqueous solution Natural Ammonium 75%-95.3% [31] Aqueous solution Natural (eight different types) Ammonium 15.7%-32.4% [32] Municipal wastewater Natural Phosphorus Ammonium 46%-100% 70% [33] Aqueous solution Natural Modified Phosphate 0.28-1.82 mg/g 1.31-1.97 mg/g [34] Aqueous solution Natural Phosphate Up to 26.48 mg/g [35] Aqueous solution Modified with nanosized particles of magnetite Arsenate Up to 5.2 mg/g [36] Post-treated municipal wastewater Natural Ammonium 23 ± 0.8 mg/g [37] Aqueous solution Modified with cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) Hexavalent chromium 5.8 mg/g [38] Simulated municipal wastewater (vertical flow constructed wetlands) Natural Ammonium >90%…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%