2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.09.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic analysis of vacuum residue hydrocracking in early reaction stages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be found that H 2 and CO 2 contents are higher than that of non‐catalytic cracking when iron‐containing mixed oxides were added, which is consistent with the results obtained from Wang et al and Fumoto et al They used iron oxide based catalysts for the catalytic cracking of heavy oil, and found that the H 2 and CO 2 contents are much higher in the presence of iron oxide based catalysts than in the non‐catalytic cracking. The condensation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons on the catalyst surface may produce H 2 . The second oxide in the catalysts suppressed the oxidation of the tar and promoted its hydrogenation .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be found that H 2 and CO 2 contents are higher than that of non‐catalytic cracking when iron‐containing mixed oxides were added, which is consistent with the results obtained from Wang et al and Fumoto et al They used iron oxide based catalysts for the catalytic cracking of heavy oil, and found that the H 2 and CO 2 contents are much higher in the presence of iron oxide based catalysts than in the non‐catalytic cracking. The condensation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons on the catalyst surface may produce H 2 . The second oxide in the catalysts suppressed the oxidation of the tar and promoted its hydrogenation .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various kinetic models have been proposed by several researchers (Froment, 2005;Botchway et al, 2004;Browning et al, 2016;Ancheyta et al, 2005;Elizalde et al, 2010;Puron et al, 2014) to study the product distribution in hydrocracking. A commonly used approach is to consider the mixture in terms of selected lumps, which can be specified in terms of structural characteristics, such as boiling point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, the required kinetic model should consider all the elementary reactions occurring during hydrogenation [7], but practical application is impossible because of the complexity of the reaction mixture consisting of numerous components. Thus, existing modeling technologies of hydrogenation are primarily based on the lumped method [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16], in which the complex mixture is usually divided into smaller groups of pseudo components with respect to their properties, such as boiling point, and http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014. 10.009 0306-2619/Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%