1990
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600790602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic Analysis of Enantiomers of Threo-Methylphenidate and Its Metabolite in Two Healthy Subjects after Oral Administration as Determined by a Gas Chromatographic-Mass Spectrometric Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, an oral dose of 1 mg/kg methylphenidate produced plasma levels of 9.3 ng/ml within 15 min (Kuczenski and Segal, 2002). An earlier study reported ∼2 ng/ml plasma levels of methylphenidate following 0.5 mg/kg oral dose, 36 ng/kg following 2 mg/kg dose and 62 ng/ml following 3.5 mg/kg dose (Aoyama et al, 1990). Oral administration of 0.75 mg/kg was predicted to yield peak plasma concentrations between 2 and 9 ng/ml, representing lower limits of the clinical range, whereas a dose of 3 mg/kg was predicted to produce peak plasma concentrations between 30 and 60 ng/ml, corresponding to upper limits of the clinical range (Kuczenski and Segal, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In another study, an oral dose of 1 mg/kg methylphenidate produced plasma levels of 9.3 ng/ml within 15 min (Kuczenski and Segal, 2002). An earlier study reported ∼2 ng/ml plasma levels of methylphenidate following 0.5 mg/kg oral dose, 36 ng/kg following 2 mg/kg dose and 62 ng/ml following 3.5 mg/kg dose (Aoyama et al, 1990). Oral administration of 0.75 mg/kg was predicted to yield peak plasma concentrations between 2 and 9 ng/ml, representing lower limits of the clinical range, whereas a dose of 3 mg/kg was predicted to produce peak plasma concentrations between 30 and 60 ng/ml, corresponding to upper limits of the clinical range (Kuczenski and Segal, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This finding is consistent with that of extensive enantiospecific pharmacokinetic studies that have measured both isomers and found the l-isomer to generally attain only a small fraction of that of circulating concentrations of d-MPH (Table 1). [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] In addition, the plasma half-life (t 1/2 ) of d-MPH is markedly longer than that of l-MPH. 22 The presystemic metabolism and clearance of d,l-MPH is an enantioselective process resulting in markedly higher plasma concentrations of d-MPH relative to l-MPH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] In these studies, determination of both MP and RA required parallel sample processing using liquid-liquid extraction procedures 2,3 or solid phase extraction (SPE) methods that performed well for MP, but gave low recoveries of RA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%