2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2013.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic analysis and self-accelerating decomposition temperature (SADT) of dicumyl peroxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A value of 153.1 kJ ·mol −1 was found and lead to a second set of parameters, labeled B, still assuming a pseudo first‐order model for the principal peak. This method provides the best fit to experimental data and a heat of reaction ΔH2 of 831 J ·g −1 (79% of ΔHDCPO) was found for the principal peak, within the range of ΔHDCPO reported in . The value of 153.1 kJ ·mol −1 for the energy of activation is significantly higher than those reported in , between 125 and 139 kJ ·mol −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A value of 153.1 kJ ·mol −1 was found and lead to a second set of parameters, labeled B, still assuming a pseudo first‐order model for the principal peak. This method provides the best fit to experimental data and a heat of reaction ΔH2 of 831 J ·g −1 (79% of ΔHDCPO) was found for the principal peak, within the range of ΔHDCPO reported in . The value of 153.1 kJ ·mol −1 for the energy of activation is significantly higher than those reported in , between 125 and 139 kJ ·mol −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The set of parameters A considers that 87% of ΔHDCPO is due to the second peak. The set of parameters A is within the range of values reported in (Table ) and provides a heat of reaction for the principal peak, ΔH2, of 904 J ·g −1 , slightly higher than ΔHDCPO values reported in . trueα̇DCPO=k1·eE1RT·1ζα1n1+k2·eE2RT·ζα2n2 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence for runs performed at different heating rates, βi, Af(α) will be constant at a fixed conversion degree, α [11]. By measuring the temperature, T and the reaction rate, dα/dt, at the fixed conversion degree, α, for all experiments performed at different heating rates, the activation energy can be calculated from the slope of the representation of ln(dα/dt)α,i vs 1/Tα,i whereas from the intercept ln(Af(α)k0) is obtained [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. Whilst this differential method does not employ any mathematical approximation, as in the case of other integral methods, it can be considered as more accurate than the integral ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%