1958
DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1958.10532418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinesthetic Cues in the Development of Time Concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increased consistency of counting judgments [Hicks and Allen, 1979] makes the estimates directly proportional to the subject's estimate of 1 s. There is substantial evidence that time judgments made by counting differ from those made by not count ing: (1)judgments made by counting do not correlate with judgments made without counting [Kruup. 1961;Spivak and Levine, 1964]; (2) counting productions of 1 s correlate with counting productions of 8, 16, and 32 s, whereas when not counting, 1-second productions do not correlate with productions of the longer durations [Spivak and Levine, 1964]; (3) counting substantially lowers STRs [Goldstone et al. 1958b;Hare, 1963: Hicks andAllen, 1979;Spivak and Levine, 1964]; (4) effects of some other variables produce differential results in counting and noncounting conditions [Hicks and Allen, 1979]; and (5) amnesic patients perform abnormally on entire-interval judgments but perform normally on counting judgments [Hicks et al, unpublished].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased consistency of counting judgments [Hicks and Allen, 1979] makes the estimates directly proportional to the subject's estimate of 1 s. There is substantial evidence that time judgments made by counting differ from those made by not count ing: (1)judgments made by counting do not correlate with judgments made without counting [Kruup. 1961;Spivak and Levine, 1964]; (2) counting productions of 1 s correlate with counting productions of 8, 16, and 32 s, whereas when not counting, 1-second productions do not correlate with productions of the longer durations [Spivak and Levine, 1964]; (3) counting substantially lowers STRs [Goldstone et al. 1958b;Hare, 1963: Hicks andAllen, 1979;Spivak and Levine, 1964]; (4) effects of some other variables produce differential results in counting and noncounting conditions [Hicks and Allen, 1979]; and (5) amnesic patients perform abnormally on entire-interval judgments but perform normally on counting judgments [Hicks et al, unpublished].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), visualizing the movement of a clock's second hand, and tapping a rhythmical pattern (e.g., Brown, Newcomb, & Kahrl, 1995;Doob, 1971, pp. 164-165;Goldstone, Boardman, & Lhamon, 1958;Guay & Wilberg, 1983), all of which involve the generation of event sequences. Thus, both timing and sequencing involve temporal information processing and, so, probably invoke similar cognitive processes or mechanisms.…”
Section: University Of Southern Maine Portland Mainementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in direct opposition to the traditional view, yet is supported by the results of others (Feifel, 1957;Goldstone, et al, 1958). This is in direct opposition to the traditional view, yet is supported by the results of others (Feifel, 1957;Goldstone, et al, 1958).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%