2006
DOI: 10.1029/2006gl027694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematics of the North American–Caribbean‐Cocos plates in Central America from new GPS measurements across the Polochic‐Motagua fault system

Abstract: The Polochic‐Motagua strike‐slip fault system in Guatemala marks the on‐land plate boundary between the North American (NA) and the Caribbean (CA) plates. GPS observations in 1999 and 2003 show that the far‐field velocity across the system (NA‐CA relative velocity) is ∼20 mm/yr. This is significantly higher than the NUVEL‐1A velocity but is consistent with the GPS based CA‐NA velocity proposed by DeMets et al. (2000). The observations are modeled by a fault centered on the Motagua fault, locked at a depth of 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
124
1
16

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
18
124
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…These events are particularly common in low coupled subduction zones, as is the case of the Central American subduction (Pacheco et al, 1993;Guzmán-Speziale and Gómez-González, 2006;Lyon-Caen et al, 2006;Álvarez-Gómez et al, 2008), and have been recently studied in the area by Álvarez-Gómez et al (2012). To simulate these normal outer-rise events we used tsunamigenic sources proposed by Álvarez-Gómez et al (2012).…”
Section: Local Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These events are particularly common in low coupled subduction zones, as is the case of the Central American subduction (Pacheco et al, 1993;Guzmán-Speziale and Gómez-González, 2006;Lyon-Caen et al, 2006;Álvarez-Gómez et al, 2008), and have been recently studied in the area by Álvarez-Gómez et al (2012). To simulate these normal outer-rise events we used tsunamigenic sources proposed by Álvarez-Gómez et al (2012).…”
Section: Local Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies demonstrated that the lack of sediments in the trench, less than a few hundred metres thick, was mainly due to important crustal erosion by subduction that produce in many cases important extensional faults and collapse of the forearc (Von Huene and Ranero 2003; Vannucchi et al 2004). On the other hand, the Guatemala subduction is adjacent to the Polochic-Motagua left-lateral strike-slip zone, a plate boundary between the North America and Caribbean plates (Lyon-Caen et al 2006). Guatemala has a special position as part of the Caribbean Plate relatively moving east-southeast, and immediately adjacent to the North American Plate, which is moving in a westward direction (Morgan et al 2008).…”
Section: Nicaragua Subduction Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for extension in the back-arc is a long-accepted fact in Guatemala (Burkart and Self 1985;Guzmán-Speziale 2001;Lyon-Caen et al 2006), where it is usually attributed as a by-product of the interaction of the Caribbean-North American plate boundary with the Middle American Arc. The extension in Nicaragua and in the offshore Nicaraguan Rise was early described by Mann and Burke (1984) and is presently attributed to a faster westward motion of North America relative to South America that is accommodated by the extension within the Caribbean Plate (Doglioni et al 2007).…”
Section: Nicaragua Subduction Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) in order to test existing models of the North American-Caribbean-Cocos plate boundary (e.g., Malfait and Dinkelman, 1972;Burkart, 1983;Guzmán-Speziale et al, 1989;Lyon-Caen et al, 2006;Ratschbacher et al, 2009;Authemayou et al, 2011). The oceanic Cocos Plate is subducted beneath the North American and Caribbean plates along the Middle America Trench, while the North American-Caribbean plate boundary is a sinistral transform system which accommodates the eastward escape of the Caribbean Plate (e.g., Lyon-Caen et al, 2006;Manea and Manea, 2006;Andreani et al, 2008a;Authemayou et al, 2011). The complexity of the plate boundary comes from the fact that both the Caribbean and the North American Plate are limited to the west by a forearc sliver ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%