Kinematics for an Actuated Flexible n-Manifold

Abstract

Recent years show an increasing interest in flexible robots due to their adaptability merits. This paper introduces a novel set of hyper-redundant flexible robots which we call actuated flexible manifold (AFM). The AFM is a two-dimensional hyper-redundant grid surface embedded in ℝ2 or ℝ3. Theoretically, such a mechanism can be manipulated into any continuous smooth function. We introduce the mathematical framework for the kinematics of an AFM. We prove that for a nonsingular configuration, the number of degrees of freedom (DOF) of an AFM is simply the number of its grid segments. We also show that for a planar rectangular grid, every nonsingular configuration that is also energetically stable is isolated. We show how to calculate the forward and inverse kinematics for such a mechanism. Our analysis is also applicable for three-dimensional hyper-redundant structures as well. Finally, we demonstrate our solution on some actuated flexible grid-shaped surfaces.

Accurate 3D Mapping Algorithm for Flexible Antennas

“…It is based on a flexible expandable main reflector and an adjustable robotic subreflector which can compensate for minor changes in the main reflector surface. Mechanical mechanisms for manipulating the robotic subreflector may be based on linear servo or piezoelectric motors [3] but can also be based on bioinspired manipulators (see [14]). In order to optimize high-frequency RF communication (e.g., Ka bands), the main antenna should be mapped with an accuracy level which is 25-50 times higher than the communication typical wavelength (about 1 cm in Ka), leading to a challenging mapping accuracy requirement of about 0.2-0.1 mm on average (see [15]).…”

Flexible-Robotic Reflector for Aerospace Applications

“…Our main goal here is to design a many-degree-of-freedom surface robot that will serve as a subreflector antenna. In the course of planning the antenna's mechanical design we considered several conceptual options [7] with regard to their backbone structure: (i) hyper redundant rigid robots: which are built in a traditional rigid link and joint concatenation manner but typically have full dexterity in almost all configurations like the robotic worm introduced in [8]; (ii) soft robots: which are mechanisms that possess a compressible flexible backbone (examples are scarce but see [9][10][11]); (iii) flexible robots: that possess a noncompressible flexible backbone such as the robotic surface introduced in [7] or the physical interaction board introduced by Vink et al in [12]. In this paper we shall discuss a flexible-robot antenna which conceptually is designed as Vink's pin-board [12].…”

MonoBot: A Single-Actuator Walking Robot

“…I N the realm of robotics, the method of actuation is a key factor that defines a robot's capabilities. Robotic arms and manifolds [1], are equipped with actuators at each joint for precise control. Overactuated robots, which possess more actuators than joints, offer enhanced adaptability and control precision [2], whereas underactuated robots, characterized by having fewer actuators than joints, face control complexities but gain advantages from their simple design.…”