2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2004.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematics analyses of Dodekapod

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Define that c is position vector, c=[q 1 , q 2 , q 3 ] T , and β is rotation Euler angle vector, β=[q 4 …”
Section: Forward Kinematics Under Mgnrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Define that c is position vector, c=[q 1 , q 2 , q 3 ] T , and β is rotation Euler angle vector, β=[q 4 …”
Section: Forward Kinematics Under Mgnrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinematics of parallel manipulator can be largely divided into two categories, inverse kinematics and forward kinematics [4]. The inverse kinematics is easily realized using closed-form solution [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore they are also known as reconfigurable manipulators 2 of SG type. In [8] a design is suggested, which has six redundant dofs (3 in the platform and 3 in the base). The weak points of this so-called dodekapod are that on the one hand additional mass/inertia (motor of active joints) is added to the platform and that on the other hand passive prismatic joints are used, which are difficult to implement in practice (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modular design consists of a set of standardized modules which can be connected and disconnected in order to obtain different configurations (Xi et al, 2011;Yu et al, 2012;Plitea et al, 2013;Carbonari et al, 2014). On the other hand, in a variable geometry approach the dimensions of the geometric parameters of the robot are modified to achieve new configurations (Zhang and Shi, 2012;Bande et al, 2005;du Plessis and Snyman, 2006;Kumar et al, 2009;Borrás et al, 2009;Chen, 2012;Ye, 2014). The variable geometry approach is more used than the modular design because it offers the advantage of easy implementation during the operation of the robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%