2018
DOI: 10.1002/nag.2771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematical analysis of 3D passive earth pressure with nonlinear yield criterion

Abstract: Conventional methods for calculation of passive earth pressure were mainly based on the assumptions of the linear Mohr-Coulomb yield condition and plane strain failure mechanism. However, both theoretical and experimental studies have shown that such assumptions are not satisfied in some geotechnical projects. Herein, a novel method incorporating a kinematically admissible 3-dimensional (3D) rotational failure mechanism and the nonlinear powerlaw yield criterion is proposed to compute the passive earth pressur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the material strength described by the Mohr‐Coulomb criterion, such a surface forms an admissible failure surface in the rotational mechanism as it assures that the vector of velocity is inclined at internal friction angle ϕ to the conical surface at every point of the surface. Such surface was earlier postulated in a translational mechanism under square and rectangular footings and was more recently used to analyze passive pressure on retaining walls . This surface can also be modified to account for pressure‐dependent geomaterials with nonlinear strength envelopes .…”
Section: Rotational 3d Failure Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the material strength described by the Mohr‐Coulomb criterion, such a surface forms an admissible failure surface in the rotational mechanism as it assures that the vector of velocity is inclined at internal friction angle ϕ to the conical surface at every point of the surface. Such surface was earlier postulated in a translational mechanism under square and rectangular footings and was more recently used to analyze passive pressure on retaining walls . This surface can also be modified to account for pressure‐dependent geomaterials with nonlinear strength envelopes .…”
Section: Rotational 3d Failure Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such surface was earlier postulated in a translational mechanism under square and rectangular footings 41 and was more recently used to analyze passive pressure on retaining walls. 42 This surface can also be modified to account for pressure-dependent geomaterials with nonlinear strength envelopes. 43,44 Since its inception, the 3D slope failure mechanism postulated 14 was adopted in many slope stability studies.…”
Section: Curvilinear Cone Failure Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinematic limit‐analysis approach is employed to obtain the solution, which has been proved to be an effective method in addressing geotechnical stability problems. The kinematic approach indicates that for an arbitrary valid collapse mechanism, the internal dissipated rate does not exceed the external work rate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the limit equilibrium method, a much more rigorous method for assessing the stability of geostructures became available with the advent of the limit theorems of classical plasticity in the 1950s . Thus, the upper bound theorem‐based kinematic approach has been widely applied to investigate the stability of saturated and/or dry soil slopes . However, because it is difficult to construct 3D admissible failure mechanisms in frictional/cohesive soils, the limit analysis method has not been applied to assess the stability of unsaturated soil slopes with tension cracks under 3D condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Thus, the upper bound theorem-based kinematic approach has been widely applied to investigate the stability of saturated and/or dry soil slopes. 11,[38][39][40][41][42] However, because it is difficult to construct 3D admissible failure mechanisms in frictional/cohesive soils, the limit analysis method has not been applied to assess the stability of unsaturated soil slopes with tension cracks under 3D condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%