2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.117.051301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect with Projected Fields: A Novel Probe of the Baryon Distribution with Planck, WMAP, and WISE Data

Abstract: The kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (KSZ) effect-the Doppler boosting of cosmic microwave background (CMB) photons due to Compton scattering off free electrons with nonzero bulk velocity-probes the abundance and the distribution of baryons in the Universe. All KSZ measurements to date have explicitly required spectroscopic redshifts. Here, we implement a novel estimator for the KSZ-large-scale structure cross-correlation based on projected fields: it does not require redshift estimates for individual objects, all… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
151
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
151
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This reduces the measurement uncertainties, and extends the mass range of the resulting cluster sample to smaller masses (although, for a fixed lower mass bound, the method will be limited by the number of haloes present in the surveyed patch, which is a different manifestation of the cosmic variance problem). This very fact also distinguishes this method from other procedures proposed in the literature to measure the kSZ effect, such as the pairwise kSZ signal [73] or the projected-field probe of [20]. These methods would in turn be less sensitive to cluster blending effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This reduces the measurement uncertainties, and extends the mass range of the resulting cluster sample to smaller masses (although, for a fixed lower mass bound, the method will be limited by the number of haloes present in the surveyed patch, which is a different manifestation of the cosmic variance problem). This very fact also distinguishes this method from other procedures proposed in the literature to measure the kSZ effect, such as the pairwise kSZ signal [73] or the projected-field probe of [20]. These methods would in turn be less sensitive to cluster blending effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The potential of combining kSZ measurements with galaxy surveys has been discussed before: forecasts for combinations of upcoming experiments were explored in [23,[27][28][29], and redshift surveys were essential in the first determination of the kSZ streaming velocity [16], as well as more recent attempts using the CMASS survey to pull out the kSZ signal at redshifts z ∼ 0.4-0.7 [18]. In this section we build on previous work and lay out, in detail, the observables that we need to work with, and the various steps involved in building up a reliable estimator for the growth rate.…”
Section: Growth Reconstruction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cross-correlation coefficient can reach values as high as ρ ≈ 70%, depending on the CIB frequency and angular scales considered. The distribution of infrared galaxies probed by WISE has also been shown to be well-correlated with the CMB lensing potential [33]. Although the WISE galaxy density map has a lower overall cross-correlation coefficient with the CMB lensing field (ρ ≈ 30%) than the CIB does, its redshift kernel is highly complementary to that of the CIB (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…WISE mapped the entire sky at wavelengths of 3.4, 4.6, 12, and 22 µm with an angular resolution of 6.1 , 6.4 , 6.5 , and 12.0 , respectively [41]. In particular, we use a WISE galaxy sample constructed via color cuts (following [42]) for analyses of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe [43] and kinematic SunyaevZel'dovich effects [33,44]. Although these galaxies are located at relatively low redshift (z < 1, with a peak at z ≈ 0.3 [45]), their cross-correlation with the Planck PR2 CMB lensing map has been detected at 56σ [33].…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%