2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2018.09.025
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic study of Iquique 2014 M 8.1 earthquake: Understanding the segmentation of the seismogenic zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 ), and the largest aftershock ruptures the boundary between the highly locked zone and an area characterized by lower locking at 20° 46′S. Particularly, the largest aftershock ruptured down dip unlock regions of the megathrust, this situation can be interpreted as a result of static CSC caused by the mainshock as it has been demonstrated by a previous study 45 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…4 ), and the largest aftershock ruptures the boundary between the highly locked zone and an area characterized by lower locking at 20° 46′S. Particularly, the largest aftershock ruptured down dip unlock regions of the megathrust, this situation can be interpreted as a result of static CSC caused by the mainshock as it has been demonstrated by a previous study 45 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The rupture region of the Mw 8.1 Iquique earthquake had been monitored for more than 7 years before the mainshock by the Integrated Plate boundary Observatory Chile (IPOC) (GFZ and CNRS‐INSU , 2006), providing a unique opportunity to study the spatiotemporal relationships between background seismicity, geodetically derived locking, foreshock activity, and mainshock rupture. Due to the wealth of these observational data, the Iquique earthquake sequence has been extensively studied (e.g., Duputel et al, 2015; Hayes et al, 2014; Herman et al, 2015; Jara et al, 2018; Lay et al, 2014; Meng et al, 2015; Ruiz et al, 2014; Schurr et al, 2014; Soto et al, 2019; Yagi et al, 2014). It broke a central portion of the approximately 500‐km‐long segment that ruptured last in the great 1877 northern Chile megathrust event (Ruiz & Madariaga, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The northern portion of the Chilean subduction, from the city of Arica (−18.5° N) to the Mejillones Peninsula (−23° N), has been spared from major earthquakes since 1877 (Comte & Pardo, 1991; Nishenko, 1991) and has long been considered a seismic gap. On 1 April 2014, the Iquique earthquake of moment magnitude 8.2 broke a section of this seismic gap with a maximum slip of about 8 m (Duputel et al, 2015; Jara et al, 2018; Lay et al, 2014; Liu et al, 2015; Meng et al, 2015; Ruiz et al, 2014; Yagi et al, 2014). This earthquake was preceded by a series of seismic clusters described by Schurr et al (2014): The very first anomalous and shallow was reported on 23 July 2013 offshore the city of Iquique and lasted for few days; the second cluster appeared in January 2014; the last cluster that happened on 16 March 2014 and started with a major upper‐plate crustal foreshock of M w 6.7 (Bedford et al, 2015) and lasted until the mainshock of 1 April.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%