2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2013.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic modeling of folding above listric propagating thrusts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This thinning is due to a reduction in the accommodation space available for sediment deposition and/or elevated rates of erosion above the growing fold [ Burbank et al ., ; Burbank and Anderson , ; Suppe et al ., ; Suppe , ]. Previous authors have demonstrated the possibility of reconstructing fold growth kinematics using the geometry of growth strata [ Cardozo and Brandenburg , ; Suppe et al ., ; Vergés et al ., ]. We are interested in determining the onset of fault‐related folding to constrain MTFS timing.…”
Section: Timing Of Wedge‐front Fault Initiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This thinning is due to a reduction in the accommodation space available for sediment deposition and/or elevated rates of erosion above the growing fold [ Burbank et al ., ; Burbank and Anderson , ; Suppe et al ., ; Suppe , ]. Previous authors have demonstrated the possibility of reconstructing fold growth kinematics using the geometry of growth strata [ Cardozo and Brandenburg , ; Suppe et al ., ; Vergés et al ., ]. We are interested in determining the onset of fault‐related folding to constrain MTFS timing.…”
Section: Timing Of Wedge‐front Fault Initiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies using the FMD method modeled the underlying fault of Amenthes Rupes, as well as other lobate scarps in Mars, as a rectangular planar fault (Egea‐González et al, ; Herrero‐Gil et al, ; Grott et al, ; Ruiz et al, ; Schultz & Watters, ), because this method does not provide results as good as when the model is made using non‐planar morphologies (Schultz & Watters, ; Watters & Nimmo, ). A positive listric fault morphology was obtained by Mueller et al, (2014) for Amenthes Rupes and by Herrero‐Gil et al, (2020) for Ogygis Rupes and its backthrusts, based on the relation between the fault propagation anticline topography and the fault plane characteristics (e.g., Amos et al, ; Cardozo & Brandemburg, 2014; Ellis et al, ; Erslev, ; Seeber & Sorlien, ). On the contrary, a planar fault morphology that keeps its dip constant until the horizontal decollement would generate a backlimb with the same dip as the fault and abrupt limits (e.g., Amos et al, ; Brandemburg, 2013; Hardy & Ford, ), which is not the case for any of the studied faults (Figure S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Allmendinger (1998); Cardozo and Aanonsen (2009) and Cardozo and Brandenburg (2014) find the best set of parameters for trishear algorithms using numerical optimization. Similarly, the kinematic parameters of our operator are chosen by Particle Swarm Optimization (Eberhart and Kennedy, 1995), a derivative-free optimization method.…”
Section: Modeling Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The displacement magnitude is controlled by a given maximum slip length and three parametric profiles. Instead of manually adjusting the parameters of the fault operator, we use numerical optimization to match available horizon data as in Allmendinger (1998);Cardozo and Aanonsen (2009);Cardozo et al (2011) and Cardozo and Brandenburg (2014). Our fault operator is thus consistent with fault geometries, horizon observations and theoretical displacement models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%