2017
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.1793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic analysis of head, trunk, and pelvic motion during mirror therapy for stroke patients

Abstract: Abstract.[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate mirror therapy (MT) condition by analyzing kinematic parameters according to mirror size and angle. [Subjects and Methods] Three hemiparesis stroke patients and five healthy adults participated in this cross-sectional study. Kinematic parameters during the MT were collected over a total of 5 trials for each subject (3 mirror angles × 3 mirror sizes). Center of pressure (COP) excursion data was collected by force plate, and other kinematic paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown previously, that the reflection equipment in coronally front of patients could reduce posture problems associated with MT, which typically are a shifting of weight and leaning toward the unaffected side, with possible disadvantageous effects on therapy efficacy. 7 We therefore expect the camMVF apparatus used in this study to likewise reduce cervical posture tension and weight shifting. To provide a standardized and systematic procedure for MT, the cam-MVF entailed 2 sections: (1) simple motor training, which contained gross and fine motor tasks, including grasping, finger opposition, pinching, wrist extension/flexion, forearm supination/pronation and so on, and (2) task-based motor training, where texture-varying objects like a glass, wooden blocks, tennis ball, and duster were used to provide task-based training, including specific reaching or placing tasks.…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown previously, that the reflection equipment in coronally front of patients could reduce posture problems associated with MT, which typically are a shifting of weight and leaning toward the unaffected side, with possible disadvantageous effects on therapy efficacy. 7 We therefore expect the camMVF apparatus used in this study to likewise reduce cervical posture tension and weight shifting. To provide a standardized and systematic procedure for MT, the cam-MVF entailed 2 sections: (1) simple motor training, which contained gross and fine motor tasks, including grasping, finger opposition, pinching, wrist extension/flexion, forearm supination/pronation and so on, and (2) task-based motor training, where texture-varying objects like a glass, wooden blocks, tennis ball, and duster were used to provide task-based training, including specific reaching or placing tasks.…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1,5,6 However, there are some technological limitations and disadvantages, such as posture pressure and lack of engagement, which hinder the treatment effects. 7,8 To overcome these extrinsic limitations, camera technique-based mirror visual feedback (MVF) system has been proposed to provide novel interfaces. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Feasibility and effectiveness of this approach have been demonstrated in both healthy populations and patients with peripheral nerve injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MT is a plasticity-based approach shown to have significant effects on motor impairment in RCTs3 6 7; however, real mirrors have some technological limitations and disadvantages, including weight shifting and postural pressure,9 10 which may be overcome using camMVF. The present study is aimed at testing the effectiveness of camMVF therapy, compare it with conventional treatment for stroke rehabilitation, and investigate the underlying neural mechanisms for involved aspects of cognition and brain networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MT, a plane mirror is employed to provide a reflection of the movements of the unaffected hand. The reflection (referred to as mirror visual feedback or MVF) can generate a misperception of ownership which is recognised as a mirror illusion; however, the real mirror used in MT has some disadvantages including lack of balance control, postural pressure and weight shifting and it provides an undiversified training programme, all of which limit its clinical application 9 10. Numerous studies have proposed various technological approaches to create a new MVF interface to overcome these disadvantages 10–14.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation