2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2008.00533.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinds and Conscious Experience: Is There Anything That It Is Like to Be Something?

Abstract: In this article I distinguish the notion of there being something it is like to be a certain kind of creature from that of there being something it is like to have a certain kind of experience. Work on consciousness has typically dealt with the latter while employing the language of the former. I propose several ways of analyzing what it is like to be a certain kind of creature and find problems with them all. The upshot is that even if there is something it is like to have certain kinds of experience, it does… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I do not have an apodictic argument to show that the privileged cannot attain generalized identification by this process, in part because it is unclear what exactly the target outcome is. But I will follow Simon Evnine (2008) by considering two ways to derive an account of ‘what it is like to be a K’ from individual experiences of K‐type beings, where ‘K’ ranges over types of being that have phenomenal consciousness 20 . Evnine is concerned with whether there is a way to derive such an account when Ks are kinds of creature, such as bats or humans.…”
Section: Against Generalized Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…I do not have an apodictic argument to show that the privileged cannot attain generalized identification by this process, in part because it is unclear what exactly the target outcome is. But I will follow Simon Evnine (2008) by considering two ways to derive an account of ‘what it is like to be a K’ from individual experiences of K‐type beings, where ‘K’ ranges over types of being that have phenomenal consciousness 20 . Evnine is concerned with whether there is a way to derive such an account when Ks are kinds of creature, such as bats or humans.…”
Section: Against Generalized Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The candidate abstracta are too vague and insubstantial. Second, while it is fairly plausible that one could extrapolate from ‘what it is likes’ of all the sensory modalities a description of things that they have in common – say, that they are directed towards objects – such a description will not be an account of ‘what it is like’ in the relevant sense; it will not be a phenomenally rich thing that one must experience in order to grasp (Evnine, 2008, pp. 191–194).…”
Section: Against Generalized Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, Nagel's notion expressly has to do only with conscious experience (436). Some worry that no clear sense can be made of this notion—that there is nothing it is like to be a certain kind of creature (e.g., Tilghman 1991; Evnine 2008). Yet, even these critics sometimes allow (reluctantly) that an acceptably precise account might be given 6…”
Section: An Immodest Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%