“…Three of those 12 educational leadership articles are teaching cases from UCEA's Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership (Brown, 2017; Dishman et al, 2011; Kent & Curran, 2021), which would be helpful to include in a preparation program course, but are not empirical research. The remaining nine articles include: - two which recommend against zero tolerance policies in favor of threat assessment, including one description of how threat assessment guidelines were developed and the previously mentioned article from Educational Leadership (Cornell, 2003; Landrum et al, 2019);
- an analysis of case law regarding zero tolerance policies (Losinski et al, 2014);
- a qualitative study of the experiences of Columbine parents in order to inform educators’ responses after trauma (Mears, 2007);
- a theoretical analysis of how violence might result from oppression (Michaelis, 2004);
- a summary of interviews with principals about the threat of gun violence, as noted above, in Educational Leadership (Rogers, 2019);
- a survey of school counselors pre- and post-Columbine about student confidentiality, and focus groups with students about how to improve anonymous reporting, with recommendations for school leaders (Stone & Isaacs, 2002);
- an overview of the Fourth Amendment and searching backpacks for weapons in Phi Delta Kappan, as mentioned above (Underwood, 2017a);
- and a case study of the hiring of SROs in one mostly white district after Sandy Hook and the ways in which SROs interpreted their unclear roles (Viano et al, 2021).
We conclude that there is little empirical research related to school shootings by educational researchers or for educational leaders.…”