2016
DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2016.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinase-associated gene mutation pattern and clinical relevance in 205 patients with core binding factor leukemias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, patients with bi CEBPA in this study presented a lower platelet count at diagnosis compared with those without (median, 24 × 10 9 /L vs. 49 × 10 9 /L, P < 0.001; Supplementary Table 4 ), which was also observed by Taskesen et al 11 These results suggest that CEBPA mutations may exert adverse impact on hematopoietic differentiation and recovery of blood count after chemotherapy. In contrast, although we 12 and others 13 have reported that C-KIT mutations were adverse events in core binding factor leukemias, they were less common in CRi patients compared with those who achieved CR, which needs to be verified in large population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Notably, patients with bi CEBPA in this study presented a lower platelet count at diagnosis compared with those without (median, 24 × 10 9 /L vs. 49 × 10 9 /L, P < 0.001; Supplementary Table 4 ), which was also observed by Taskesen et al 11 These results suggest that CEBPA mutations may exert adverse impact on hematopoietic differentiation and recovery of blood count after chemotherapy. In contrast, although we 12 and others 13 have reported that C-KIT mutations were adverse events in core binding factor leukemias, they were less common in CRi patients compared with those who achieved CR, which needs to be verified in large population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Gene mutations associated with epigenetic modification are also considered as poor factors, such as MLL , DNMT3A , TET2 , and ASXL1 mutations [ 12 , 17 , 18 ], while mutant NPM1 is regarded as a favorable one [ 12 , 19 , 20 ]. In addition, numerous clinical studies have proven the role of tumor suppressor genes such as TP53 and WT1 in cytogenetic normal AML (CN-AML) [ 21 24 ] and C - KIT in core binding factor AML (CBF-AML) [ 25 ]. Metallothionein III (MT3) may also act as a tumor suppressor gene of which the promoter hypermethylation can inactivate the gene and downregulate its expression level in pediatric AML [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several lines of evidence suggest that CBFB::MYH11 and RUNX1:: RUNX1T1 may act by different mechanisms. AMLs with these fusions have distinct DNA methylation patterns (43)(44)(45), distinct gene expression profiles (43,46), distinct proteomic signatures (47), different common cooperating mutations (43,(48)(49)(50)(51)(52), and different clinical phenotypes (53)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59). Other proposed models of CBFB::MYH11 AML initiation take some of these differences into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%