2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10814-020-09147-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Killing the Priest-King: Addressing Egalitarianism in the Indus Civilization

Abstract: The cities of the Indus civilization were expansive and planned with large-scale architecture and sophisticated Bronze Age technologies. Despite these hallmarks of social complexity, the Indus lacks clear evidence for elaborate tombs, individual-aggrandizing monuments, large temples, and palaces. Its first excavators suggested that the Indus civilization was far more egalitarian than other early complex societies, and after nearly a century of investigation, clear evidence for a ruling class of managerial elit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
(159 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distributed power (collective) tended to occur with sizable bureaucracies, dispersal of public goods, and reliance on local or "internal" sources of revenue to fund governance. Social scientists may not agree on what accounts for this institutional variance, but organizational diversity in the premodern past is becoming much more broadly recognized (Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012;Bevir, 2012;Stasavage, 2020;Green, 2021).…”
Section: Governance At Monte Albanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributed power (collective) tended to occur with sizable bureaucracies, dispersal of public goods, and reliance on local or "internal" sources of revenue to fund governance. Social scientists may not agree on what accounts for this institutional variance, but organizational diversity in the premodern past is becoming much more broadly recognized (Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012;Bevir, 2012;Stasavage, 2020;Green, 2021).…”
Section: Governance At Monte Albanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In building empire, the Aztec employed a diverse mix of cosmological, bureaucratic, and patrimonial messaging and communication (to a far greater degree than in prior eras); the governing practices of the empire likewise were intermediate between collective and autocratic [24,71] . At the core of the Aztec empire, political and economic integration was more organic and interconnected [20,21] , so that the prior organizations of previously autonomous city-states were broken down and reconfigured [151] . At the same time, in distant provinces, local rulers were left in place.…”
Section: Prehispanic Mesoamerican Temporal Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, processual models are now considered as too narrow (Yoffee 1993; McIntosh 2005; Kenoyer 2008); councils, competing clans and other social structures that were more flexible and less hierarchical could also organise large populations into state-like entities (e.g. Green 2021).…”
Section: Complicating the Processual Early Statementioning
confidence: 99%