We live in challenging timesChange has become an enduring feature in our lives. Advances in science and technology, for example, have transformed our work practices, altered our home life and (seemingly) usurped much of our leisure time. All too often, it appears, innovation has thoughtlessly supplanted tradition; the unfamiliar has superseded the familiar, and in most day-to-day enterprises individuals have been sucked involuntarily into impersonal administrative labyrinths. Moreover, increased family mobility coupled with access to across-country as well as overseas employment have helped weaken the nuclear and extended family, once the principal sources of help individuals and households in times of need.Understandably, changes of this kind have impacted upon ways in which children are brought up in the home, in the community and at school. Many families -and communities -now appear less able or inclined to watch over their children, and less caring towards them. The frenzied pace of contemporary life, coupled with the availability of a range of time-consuming technologies such as television, video and the Internet, have helped create barriers within -and across -families and communities. Conversation is declining, finding time to listen is more difficult and adults and youngsters can lose touch with each other too easily. By way of illustration, recent research in the USA showed that, on average, parents spend fewer than 2 minutes daily interacting with their children. Moreover, in Canada, over 40 per cent of parents failed to recall the last occasion when the family sat down together for a meal, without watching television. A combination of eating and watching leaves scant time for listening and meagre opportunity for conversing.Unsurprisingly, these types of changes have left many families and individuals bereft of the resource needed both to watch over and to guide them, particularly in times of need. This loss has adversely affected the personal and social lives of many individuals, families, neighbourhoods and communities. In the decade following 1985, the number of single parents rose from 200,000 to 500,000. From another perspective, Davies (1997) talks of a British underclass, which he numbers to be around a quarter of the population, where there is a routine neglect of children, and where homes are characterised (either separately or in combination) by violence, crime, illiteracy, unemployment, drug addiction, drunkenness and prostitution. It is a matter of much concern that many of our pupils take to school the unfortunate repercussions which may emanate from experiences of this kind.Without appropriate home support, it is easy for children to grow up lacking healthy value systems (for there are no altruistic genes). They can grow up exposed to unhealthy Arguably, long-established sources for supporting youngsters' healthy development are less available now than has often been the case. Nowadays, family, community and school infrastructures have been (and continue to be) exposed to changes which fre...