2019
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

KiDS+GAMA: Intrinsic alignment model constraints for current and future weak lensing cosmology

Abstract: We directly constrain the non-linear alignment (NLA) model of intrinsic galaxy alignments, analysing the most representative and complete flux-limited sample of spectroscopic galaxies available for cosmic shear surveys. We measure the projected galaxy position-intrinsic shear correlations and the projected galaxy clustering signal using high-resolution imaging from the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS) overlapping with the GAMA spectroscopic survey, and data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Separating samples by col… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
121
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(148 reference statements)
23
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our n s values are fully consistent with Planck Collaboration et al (2018) results. In addition, our joint constraints on A IA = 0.05 +0.40 −0.44 , are consistent with the direct measurements of Johnston et al (2019), who reported A IA = 1.06 +0.47 −0.46 with a 1.6σ difference. Here we have used a joint model with a single free parameter for the intrinsic alignment of galaxies.…”
Section: Appendix A: Covariance Of Cosebissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our n s values are fully consistent with Planck Collaboration et al (2018) results. In addition, our joint constraints on A IA = 0.05 +0.40 −0.44 , are consistent with the direct measurements of Johnston et al (2019), who reported A IA = 1.06 +0.47 −0.46 with a 1.6σ difference. Here we have used a joint model with a single free parameter for the intrinsic alignment of galaxies.…”
Section: Appendix A: Covariance Of Cosebissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Here, only helicityzero operators (q = 0) contribute, appearing in kernel forms tr K (3) and Y (0) * 2 .K (3) . As we saw earlier, the reason why only q = 0 terms contribute to (13) term is the coupling of linear with third order perturbations. Given that at linear order only scalar (q = 0) contributions exist, statistical isotropy ensures only q = 0 components survive also in all (13) terms.…”
Section: Bias Degeneracies and Renormalisation Of The One-loop Power mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We proceed to investigate the (13) contributions to the one-loop power spectra. Here, as discussed earlier, only the q = 0 part contributes and thus we have the density/size and shape auto-and cross-correlations P αβ(0) 00 (13) = 2b…”
Section: One-loop Power Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect is likely more prominent in redder galaxies, indicating that member galaxies in cluster regimes will be more affected by the IA (e.g. see Singh et al 2015;Samuroff et al 2018;Hikage et al 2019;Johnston et al 2019, for recent observational studies). Unfortunately, it is still difficult to include the IA effect in our halo-model approach in a selfconsistent way.…”
Section: Intrinsic Alignment In Cluster-sized Halosmentioning
confidence: 99%