2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01781.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation in the United States, 1996–2005

Abstract: Kidney and pancreas transplantation in 2005 improvedin quantity and outcome quality, despite the increasing average age of kidney graft recipients, with 56% aged 50 or older. Geography and ABO blood type contribute to the discrepancy in waiting time among the deceased donor (DD) candidates. Allocation policy changes are decreasing the median times to transplant for pediatric recipients. Overall, 6% more DD kidney transplants were performed in 2005 with slight increases in standard criteria donors (SCD) and exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
116
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
3
116
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is not surprising because it is widely known that donor age and donor kidney function are closely related to graft survival after SPK transplantation. 5,29 Our study suggests that most AMR episodes in SPK transplant recipients can be diagnosed in a similar way as in isolated kidney transplantation, with the triad of allograft dysfunction, C4d positivity in PTC, and detectable DSA in recipient serum. 9,30,31 Some of the cases reported here with C4d staining and allograft dysfunction are almost undoubtedly AMR episodes, despite the lack of DSA at the time of diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This finding is not surprising because it is widely known that donor age and donor kidney function are closely related to graft survival after SPK transplantation. 5,29 Our study suggests that most AMR episodes in SPK transplant recipients can be diagnosed in a similar way as in isolated kidney transplantation, with the triad of allograft dysfunction, C4d positivity in PTC, and detectable DSA in recipient serum. 9,30,31 Some of the cases reported here with C4d staining and allograft dysfunction are almost undoubtedly AMR episodes, despite the lack of DSA at the time of diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The first is the undeniable improvement in allograft outcomes that has occurred under CNI-based therapy, even as the field has witnessed significant aging of the donor and recipient populations, less MHC similarity between donor and recipient, and, in kidney transplantation, commonplace use of kidneys with preexisting injury (34,35). Although some studies have indeed documented excellent outcomes with CNI-free immunosuppression, CNI-based protocols have been shown over and over again in clinical trials to result in renal function at least as stable as proposed alternatives and graft survival equivalent or superior to those available with any other option, as shown in the Symphony (Efficacy Limiting Toxicity Elimination [ELITE]-Symphony) trial, the CAESAR (Cyclosporine Avoidance Eliminates Serious Adverse Renal toxicity) trial, the ORION (Optimizing Renal Transplant Immunosuppression to Overcome Nephrotoxicity) trial, and numerous single-center studies (36 -39).…”
Section: Alternatives To An Incomplete Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al fi nal del período de observación 9 pacientes estaban euglicémicos en ayunas, presentaban niveles normales de Péptido C e independencia de insulina o hipoglicemiantes orales, independencia de diálisis en 8 pacientes. En este estudio no se efectuó un análisis prospectivo de la calidad de vida de los receptores, sin embargo, los 9 pacientes con páncreas funcionantes realizan actividades normales, no presentaron eventos cardiovasculares graves ni deterioro mayor de la retinopatía, lo que coincide con la información disponible en diversas publicaciones 4,16 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified