2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1603-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ki-67 is a powerful tool for grading neuroendocrine tumors among Egyptian patients: a 10-year experience

Abstract: Ki-67 is a reliable and reproducible marker for grading of NETs and more superior than mitotic rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our country, Ki-67 was found to be somewhat higher in male patients; however, no significant correlation was found between sex and Ki-67. In a study carried out on a total of 112 patients, similar to our study, Salama et al [18] could not find a significant correlation between sex of the patients and the tumor grade.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In our country, Ki-67 was found to be somewhat higher in male patients; however, no significant correlation was found between sex and Ki-67. In a study carried out on a total of 112 patients, similar to our study, Salama et al [18] could not find a significant correlation between sex of the patients and the tumor grade.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Nadler et al [13] suggest that Ki-67 is a proliferative marker for NETs that is highly reproducible when used to grade tumors according to the ENETS and WHO staging systems. The study by Salama et al [14] also supports this finding. Unfortunately, due to small sample size, in our study, histologic grade is not associated with survival in patients with surgical resection.…”
Section: Sexmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Yao et al [ 7 ] reported that, in multivariate analysis of patients with well-differentiated to moderately-differentiated NETs, disease stage, primary tumor site and histological grade were predictors of OS (p < 0.001). A recent study showed that all G1 and G2 NETs were associated with the N0/N1 stage, while 27% of G3 NETs were associated with the N2/N3 stage and these differences were statistically significant [ 21 ]. In this study of NETLM, 17% were histological grade G1 tumors, 40% had G2 tumors and 43% had G3 tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%