2014
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1409.5088
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Khovanov Homology, Lee Homology and a Rasmussen Invariant for Virtual Knots

Abstract: The paper contains an essentially self-contained treatment of Khovanov homology, Khovanov-Lee homology as well as the Rasmussen invariant for virtual knots and virtual knot cobordisms which directly applies as well to classical knot and classical knot cobordisms. We give an alternate formulation for the Manturov definition [34] of Khovanov homology [25] [26] for virtual knots and links with arbitrary coefficients. This approach uses cut loci on the knot diagram to induce a conjugation operator in the Frobeniu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies (by properties of the quandle) that virtual knots obtained in this way from classical non-trivial knots will themselves be non-trivial. In fact, such knots are nonclassical [5]. It is an open problem whether there are classical knots (actually knotted) having unit Jones polynomial.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies (by properties of the quandle) that virtual knots obtained in this way from classical non-trivial knots will themselves be non-trivial. In fact, such knots are nonclassical [5]. It is an open problem whether there are classical knots (actually knotted) having unit Jones polynomial.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples produced by virtualization are guaranteed to be non-trivial. It is more difficult to prove in general [5] or even in special cases that such virtualizations are non-classical. This has led to the discovery of new invariants for virtual knots.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%