1995
DOI: 10.1006/csla.1995.0015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Keyword detection in conversational speech utterances using hidden Markov model based continuous speech recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the gray-shaded arrow in Fig. 4 pointing from q tr tÀ1 to q c t is only valid during the second training cycle when there are no segmentation constraints and will be ignored in Equation 5.…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the gray-shaded arrow in Fig. 4 pointing from q tr tÀ1 to q c t is only valid during the second training cycle when there are no segmentation constraints and will be ignored in Equation 5.…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since full spoken language understanding without any restriction of the expected vocabulary is hardly feasible and not necessarily needed in today's human-machine interaction scenarios (e. g. [4]), most systems apply keyword spotting as an alternative to large vocabulary continuous speech recognition. The aim of keyword spotting is to detect a set of predefined keywords from continuous speech signals [5]. When applied in human-like cognitive systems, keyword detectors have to process natural and spontaneous speech, which in contrast to well articulated read speech (as used in [6], for example) leads to comparatively low recognition rates [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More reliable model estimation may be achieved by constructing keyword models as concatenations of phonetic HMMs. More recently, benefited from large vocabulary continuous speech recognition (LVCSR) techniques, a two-stage approach [8] is often shown to deliver good word-spotting results. In the first stage, the approach uses an LVCSR decoder to produce a set of hypothesized transcriptions, from which the presence of keywords are detected and verified in the second stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a more robust strategy, word spotting approaches [5], [6] have been studied. They are classified into two approaches in terms of the modeling of non-keyword parts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%