2021
DOI: 10.35297/qjae.010108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Keynesian Supply Shocks and Hayekian Secondary Deflations

Abstract: In response to the COVID-19 lockdown policies, Guerrieri et al. (2020) developed a new concept: the Keynesian supply shock. A Keynesian supply shock is an aggregate supply shock that leads to an even larger aggregate demand shock. This paper suggests that Keynesian supply shocks are very similar to the secondary deflations suggested by Hayek (1931), and US data from the 2007–09 financial crisis show that these concepts may help to explain employment dynamics in the midst of a crisis. This fact implies that lon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rise in public spending was a result of the corporate community's increased understanding of the need to be fiscalized. The redistribution of income affects the economic and social position of the population according to their activities, economic power, and social position (Engelhardt, 2021). Economic needs through public revenue factors indirectly determine the implementation of financial policy instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rise in public spending was a result of the corporate community's increased understanding of the need to be fiscalized. The redistribution of income affects the economic and social position of the population according to their activities, economic power, and social position (Engelhardt, 2021). Economic needs through public revenue factors indirectly determine the implementation of financial policy instruments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
In 2013, Engelhardt (2013 calculated that the combined power of the top five hundred supercomputers would take approximately 10.5 quintillion years to compute the distribution of eighty thousand heterogeneous goods among six billion consumers, posing a serious practical challenge to the implementation of computerized central planning. Allin Cottrell (2021) calls into question Engelhardt's assertion, noting that the algorithm used by Engelhardt not only scales poorly but is not even valid for the problem Engelhardt posed.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his 2013 study, Engelhardt (2013) looks at technosocialism from a new perspective: is it possible for an advanced computer system to solve, in a reasonable amount of time, all the equations necessary to centrally plan an economy? He estimates the time it would take for the TOP500 supercomputers 2 to solve the system of equations required to maximize social utility for the world population, assuming heterogeneous preferences for eighty thousand heterogeneous goods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%