1981
DOI: 10.2307/249223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key Recurrent Issues in the MIS Implementation Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
6

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
53
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The failure rate of IT project continues to be high ), just as it has been for many years (Ginzberg 1981). Hence my claim is that, while the conventional wisdom is useful, it does not guarantee success.…”
Section: The Current Score Card: Re-thinking It Implementationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The failure rate of IT project continues to be high ), just as it has been for many years (Ginzberg 1981). Hence my claim is that, while the conventional wisdom is useful, it does not guarantee success.…”
Section: The Current Score Card: Re-thinking It Implementationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The conversion effectiveness of the firm will influence the way the IT is converted to productive outputs. Top management commitment has long been recognized as important for implementation success Lucas 1981, Markus 1981, Ginzberg 1981. Commitment is required in the form of a demonstration of the belief that the systems will be successful and productive tools.…”
Section: H3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ginzberg (1981) proposed the use of a diffusion of innovations model to study the implementation of IS. Lucas et al (1990), as the foundations for their model of implementation, refer to attitude models, including TRA and diffusion models.…”
Section: Theory Of Reasoned Action and It Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%