Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.04925
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key points in the determination of the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction from asymmetric bubble domain expansion

A. Magni,
G. Carlotti,
A. Casiraghi
et al.

Abstract: Different models have been used to evaluate the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) from the asymmetric bubble expansion method using magneto-optics. Here we investigate the most promising candidates over a range of different magnetic multilayers with perpendicular anisotropy. Models based on the standard creep hypothesis are not able to reproduce the domain wall (DW) velocity profile when the DW roughness is high. Our results demonstrate that the DW roughness and the interface roughness of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference in domain structure is an indication of stronger pinning effects in the annealed sample. Furthermore, smoother domain walls have been linked to smoother interfaces [42]. We can also observe a smoothing of the DW profile when increasing the field towards the depinning transition, which is consistent with current models highlighting a reduction of the roughness amplitude at higher driving forces [43].…”
Section: A Creep and Depinningsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This difference in domain structure is an indication of stronger pinning effects in the annealed sample. Furthermore, smoother domain walls have been linked to smoother interfaces [42]. We can also observe a smoothing of the DW profile when increasing the field towards the depinning transition, which is consistent with current models highlighting a reduction of the roughness amplitude at higher driving forces [43].…”
Section: A Creep and Depinningsupporting
confidence: 89%