2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key Performance Indicators for Building Condition Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Worth to be notice that DoI, describes the calculation methodology for FCI in its institutional documents, though for the actual computation, it refers to the use of Figure 7. Classification of references by type of FCI described and provenance (Rush, 1991;Kaiser, 1993;Fagan & Kirkwood, 1997;AAPPA, 2000;Vanier, 2000;Ho, E. H. W. Chan, Wong, & M. Chan, 2000;Teicholz & Edgar, 2001;Brooks, 2004;Uzarski & Grussing, 2008;IFMA, 2008;Roberts, 2009;Lavy et al, 2010Lavy et al, , 2014bBello & Loftness, 2010;Attalla, MacDonald, & Dunn, 2012;Lavy, 2013;Karanja & Mayo, 2016;Dejaco et al, 2017) Complex Differs from the previous for the calculation methodology of deferred maintenance and current replacement value (Capital Asset Management -Asset Strategies, 2011;Geldermann & Sapp, 2007;Kaiser, 2009;Maltese et al, 2017;Quirk, 2006;Rashedi & Hegazy, 2016;Selman & Schneider, 2004) Combined Indicators derived from the basic or extended version of FCI, combined with other metrics (Federal Facilities Council, 2001;Mills, 2001;NASA, 2003;Selman, 2003 Since the definition of its first version in Eq. (1), the indicator had been revised and other versions have been proposed.…”
Section: Fci Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Worth to be notice that DoI, describes the calculation methodology for FCI in its institutional documents, though for the actual computation, it refers to the use of Figure 7. Classification of references by type of FCI described and provenance (Rush, 1991;Kaiser, 1993;Fagan & Kirkwood, 1997;AAPPA, 2000;Vanier, 2000;Ho, E. H. W. Chan, Wong, & M. Chan, 2000;Teicholz & Edgar, 2001;Brooks, 2004;Uzarski & Grussing, 2008;IFMA, 2008;Roberts, 2009;Lavy et al, 2010Lavy et al, , 2014bBello & Loftness, 2010;Attalla, MacDonald, & Dunn, 2012;Lavy, 2013;Karanja & Mayo, 2016;Dejaco et al, 2017) Complex Differs from the previous for the calculation methodology of deferred maintenance and current replacement value (Capital Asset Management -Asset Strategies, 2011;Geldermann & Sapp, 2007;Kaiser, 2009;Maltese et al, 2017;Quirk, 2006;Rashedi & Hegazy, 2016;Selman & Schneider, 2004) Combined Indicators derived from the basic or extended version of FCI, combined with other metrics (Federal Facilities Council, 2001;Mills, 2001;NASA, 2003;Selman, 2003 Since the definition of its first version in Eq. (1), the indicator had been revised and other versions have been proposed.…”
Section: Fci Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…KPIs are obtained through the refinement of raw data, therefore they are employed at different decision-making levels, depending on the management needs. Typically, three decision-making levels can be recognized when dealing with performance measurement: strategic, tactical and operational [16,17].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 1 its basic contents are identified. (Dejaco et al 2017c;Re Cecconi et al 2017) This data is useful for all the stakeholders and for defining the conditions of a building during its life cycle from a technical, legislative and economic point of view. In the case of a new building, all the data come from the design and execution documentation; for an existing building it would be necessary to develop a specific building assessment and a documentation check.…”
Section: Building Logbookmentioning
confidence: 99%