2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key operating parameters affecting nitrogen removal rate in single-stage deammonification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the lack of organics in the influent, traditional biological nutrient removal efficiencies are always restricted, and it is difficult to obtain concentrations of N and P in the effluent that meet the discharge standard level Liu et al, 2016). To improve the nutrient removal efficiencies, many strategies have been suggested and attempted, such as changing the traditional treatment processes to deammonification processes, modifying the treatment systems and optimizing the operational parameters to effectively use the carbon sources (Choi et al, 2018;Rikmann et al, 2018;Zekker et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2011). Furthermore, adding external carbon sources is also an efficient method that has been studied widely by researchers in recent years (Choi et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2016;Liu et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the lack of organics in the influent, traditional biological nutrient removal efficiencies are always restricted, and it is difficult to obtain concentrations of N and P in the effluent that meet the discharge standard level Liu et al, 2016). To improve the nutrient removal efficiencies, many strategies have been suggested and attempted, such as changing the traditional treatment processes to deammonification processes, modifying the treatment systems and optimizing the operational parameters to effectively use the carbon sources (Choi et al, 2018;Rikmann et al, 2018;Zekker et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2011). Furthermore, adding external carbon sources is also an efficient method that has been studied widely by researchers in recent years (Choi et al, 2018;Guo et al, 2016;Liu et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9a). Choi et al (2018) assessed the contribution of AMX, AOB, and DB to nitrogen removal according to granule size and found that the contribution of microbial activity to nitrogen removal was signi cantly in uenced by granule size. In the presence of COD, it was shown that the contribution of AMX to TN removal was higher for granule diameter larger than 1600 μm, whereas, for granule diameter smaller than 1600 μm, the contribution of AMX to nitrogen removal was unsatisfactory at any DO level (Fig.…”
Section: In Uence Of Combined Cod and Do On Tnr And The Analysis Of Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 When the nitrogen removal process (or bacteria) is inhibited, adjusting to the appropriate HRT can effectively restore nitrogen removal performance (or bacterial activity). 12,130,131 4.2 Sludge 4.2.1 Sludge domestication. Anammox and partial deni-trication coupling methods can be divided into split and integrated processes.…”
Section: Conclusion and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%