In our previous work in the mHealth domain, we acknowledged that the unholy trinity of policy, regulation, and reimbursement collectively constrained the optimal deployment and scaling of mHealth innovations. We continue to believe in the transformative power of mHealth to improve access to many health resources and services for underserved and vulnerable populations. And, we remain confident that in the post-pandemic environment many of the creative solutions to pandemic-induced barriers to healthcare delivery will continue to be developed and improved, including those that exploited mHealth methods and technologies. Thus, an unexpected benefit of mandated widespread, and long-term, quarantine may prove to be robust assessment and determination of what components of healthcare can be delivered effectively with mHealth devices and approaches.In this series of papers, we highlight several pilot projects, some of which emerged during the COVID quarantine period as a way to continue providing needed services to home-bound individuals. We're designating these innovations as "on the periphery" of mHealth as some of their valuable contributions aid in improving infrastructure and assessment of mHealth services, although some of the projects provided new categories of services, such as support for stressful life situations, to individuals that might not have pursued them in a non-pandemic environment.The first paper published in the series (Houser et al.) (1) reported an examination of the adequacy of clinical documentation collected during telehealth encounters in physician practices, based on a survey conducted in January and February of 2021. As both providers and patients were constrained from in-person encounters during the quarantine period, an expected increase in remote service delivery occurred, with more than 60% of the provider respondents initiating telehealth options within the year prior to the survey. The authors reported continuation of known patient challenges with telehealth services-inequities in quality of technology, variability in patient understanding and satisfaction-but also acknowledged emerging provider issues. Specifically, providers experienced extreme frustration with rapid changes in payer guidelines and requirements for reimbursement for services, and the obligation for more robust documentation practices to meet those changing requirements. The responding providers expressed strong concern that "technology or reimbursement requirements [could become] the overriding focus of telehealth as opposed to patient care."Gurupur (2) addresses the issue of data incompleteness, one component of clinical documentation adequacy, from the perspective of scoring actual electronic records against a concept map of "an ideal complete electronic health record." This issue of incomplete documentation is considered with regard to one of our key concerns-improved reimbursement for services provided-as well as contributing to decreased risk for medical errors, reduced staffing requirements, and fewer treatment...