1951
DOI: 10.1525/jams.1951.4.1.03a00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key, Mode, Species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 16 The fact that adding two tetrachords together would make an octave was a coincidence, and not a principle of Ancient Greek music-making: 5th was the largest interval considered in melodic composition (Kholopov, 2006 , p. 64). Octave species were byproducts of joining the tetrachords together within a key—keys had names, whereas species remained nameless (Gombosi, 1951 ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 The fact that adding two tetrachords together would make an octave was a coincidence, and not a principle of Ancient Greek music-making: 5th was the largest interval considered in melodic composition (Kholopov, 2006 , p. 64). Octave species were byproducts of joining the tetrachords together within a key—keys had names, whereas species remained nameless (Gombosi, 1951 ). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 The fact that adding two tetrachords together would make an octave was a coincidence, and not a principle of Ancient Greek music-making: 5 th was the largest interval considered in Classical theory of melodic composition (Kholopov, 2006). Octave species were byproducts of joining the tetrachords (pentachords) together within a given key -therefore, keys had names, whereas species remained nameless (Gombosi, 1951).…”
Section: Multitonal Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that joining two tetrachords made an octave was a coincidence and not a principle of Ancient Greek melopoeia (art of making melody): Greeks simply did not have a name for intervals larger than 5th (Kholopov, 2006). Octave species were byproducts of conjoining the tetrachords (occasionally, pentachords) within a given keyfor this reason, keys had names, whereas species remained nameless (Gombosi, 1951).…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%