Key issues in information systems management: A Delphi study in Slovenia

Dekleva, Sasa M.; Zupančič, Jože

doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(96)01066-x

Cited by 60 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To determine the priority of criteria for e-LS, the mean and standard deviation were analysed [13]. After analysis, the e-LS criteria were listed according to the sequence of importance obtained from Round Two.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It involves multiple iteration or rounds of questionnaire or other means of data collection with the researcher controlling the statistical group's responses and feedback [76]. Since the consensus about the relative importance of the criteria from respondents are needed in this study, the Delphi method was chosen [13]. It allows the participation of respondents comprising experts to obtain their consensus concerning the criteria for e-LS evaluation.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Determining Evaluation Criteria And Sub-Criteria For E-Learning Software

Saad

Abdullah

Shuib

2017

MJCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today's demands for e-learning have led to the emergence of numerous and diverse e-Learning software (e-LS) products in the market. With such a myriad of choices, selecting an e-LS can be difficult. In any software evaluation process, evaluation criteria are important for correct selection to be made. However, in the case of e-LS selection, information about its evaluation criteria is lacking. Hence, a Delphi study was conducted to identify the evaluation criteria for e-LS. This paper presents the study and its results. Eleven criteria and 66 sub-criteria were identified from the literature. A questionnaire comprising the criteria as items was distributed to 31 experts in the first round. 16 sub-criteria were added by the experts. After two Delphi rounds, three criteria were considered as being extremely important and eight criteria as important. One sub-criteria was rejected as it did not achieve the majority of expert consensus. In total, 11 criteria and 81 sub-criteria were obtained from this study. The results of this study indicate that these criteria and sub-criteria are important in the evaluation of e-LS.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determining Evaluation Criteria And Sub-Criteria For E-Learning Software

Saad

Abdullah

Shuib

2017

MJCS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A two-round Delphi study by Hayne and Pollard (2000) with 157 Canadian participants identified critical IS issues in Canada. Dekleva and Zupancic (1996) used the Delphi technique to determine key issues in information systems management in Slovenia. A German perspective was described by Krcmar (1990), who conducted a survey, asking German IT executives of large and medium-sized enterprises for current issues of the field.…”

Section: On Grand Challenges Of Scientific Disciplinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considering that IS have been the major contributor to economic growth and productivity over the past decades (Watson et al 2010), this question definitely warrants our attention. While considerable effort has been put into identifying such challenges (Dickson et al 1984;Brancheau and Wetherbe 1987;Niederman et al 1990;Brancheau et al 1996;Kappelman et al 2013;Dekleva and Zupancic 1996;Krcmar 1990;Moores 1996;Wang and Turban 1994;Watson 1989;Yang 1996;Luftman et al 2013), the answers are still not obvious, and different scholars are likely to name different challenges, if asked. And, indeed, the IS field is characterized by its diversity (Schwartz 2014) as well as dynamic technological development.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In Search of Information Systems (Grand) Challenges

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper reports on the results of a Delphi study with 143 information systems (IS) academics that was designed to explore what IS academics perceive to be the grand challenges of the IS discipline. The results provide evidence that the scholarly IS discipline is still much concerned with itself, for instance, in terms of its identity, relevance, foundational theory, or methodological pluralism -suggesting that the old debate on IS identity is not yet overcome. It thus cannot be claimed that the study identifies the grand challenges of the discipline -still it becomes noticeable that the academic community sees potentials for the IS discipline to have societal impact. A total of 21 challenges are identified, of which six challenges are categorized as ''meta challenges for further developing the IS discipline'' and the remaining 15 challenges are categorized as ''IS research challenges'' pertaining to sociotechnical systems, IS infrastructures, society and ecology, as well as social well-being and affectivity. We provide a ranking of all challenges according to their relevance, potential impact, and possible time frame of realization. The results have some important implications for IS as a discipline as well as its prospective future societal role. It is hoped that through our study we can contribute to the important debate on the challenges of the academic IS discipline.

show abstract

“…Editing and content analysis are poorly understood areas of Delphi practice (Weingand, 1980;Dekleva & Zupancic, 1996;Stewart, O'Halloran, Harrigan, Spencer, Barton, & Singleton, 1999). There are no well-established protocols for shaping panel members' responses into comprehensive feedback and/or material for evaluation in subsequent Delphi rounds (Goldschmidt, 1996;Bijl, 1996).…”

Section: Analysis Of Delphi Experts' Inputmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing partnership: A Delphi study of shared resource management in the North Yukon.

Sherry¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Key issues in information systems management: A Delphi study in Slovenia

Cited by 60 publications

References 12 publications

Determining Evaluation Criteria And Sub-Criteria For E-Learning Software

Determining Evaluation Criteria And Sub-Criteria For E-Learning Software

In Search of Information Systems (Grand) Challenges

Constructing partnership: A Delphi study of shared resource management in the North Yukon.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About