2016
DOI: 10.18331/brj2016.3.2.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key issues in estimating energy and greenhouse gas savings of biofuels: challenges and perspectives

Abstract: HIGHLIGHTSLand-use and land-use changes may overestimate the biofuel sustainability.Environmental and social acceptability is essential in making biofuel-support policies. Keywords:Energy balance Greenhouse gas (GHG) balance Biofuels Sustainability Life cycle assessment (LCA)The increasing demand for biofuels has encouraged the researchers and policy makers worldwide to find sustainable biofuel production systems in accordance with the regional conditions and needs. The sustainability of a biofuel productio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regards, the life cycle assessment (LCA), cradle to grave approach, is a valuable tool to understand the environmental and economic benefits of the process and its products (Nizami et al, 2017). LCA mainly consist of steps such as functional unit, scope, system boundary, reference system, data source and allocation (Rathore et al, 2016). The proposed waste to biodiesel technologies would be multi-dimensional, since various waste feedstocks for biodiesel production as well as other value-added products involved.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regards, the life cycle assessment (LCA), cradle to grave approach, is a valuable tool to understand the environmental and economic benefits of the process and its products (Nizami et al, 2017). LCA mainly consist of steps such as functional unit, scope, system boundary, reference system, data source and allocation (Rathore et al, 2016). The proposed waste to biodiesel technologies would be multi-dimensional, since various waste feedstocks for biodiesel production as well as other value-added products involved.…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biodiesel from non-food sources such as sewage sludge, waste cooking oil (WCO), microalgae and animal fat wastes along with non-edible oil seeds such as Jatropha, Pongamia, Neem, Camelina, and Soapberries has gained significant attention due to positive energy balance and economic and environmental values as compared to both petrodiesel and conventional feedstock based biodiesel (Rathore et al, 2016). Moreover, a lot of non-food sources, as mentioned above are classified as wastes and would provide enormous economic and environmental benefits if used for biodiesel production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliance on fossil fuels also creates negative environmental impacts, which contribute to global warming and climate change. The global consumption of fossil fuels not only impacts the environment but also poses a risk to energy systems in terms of both energy security and energy sustainability, particularly in the countries that need to import fossil fuels (Rathore et al, 2016). In light of these concerns, many countries, both developed and developing, are looking to overcome these issues by searching and innovating renewable energy resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These new methods for reducing biodiesel production costs offer improved production technologies for better yield, reduced capital costs, and reduced raw material costs, of which feedstock cost is the most dominant [125]. Therefore, many studies of various non-food feedstocks including waste cooking oil (WCO), microalgae, and non-edible seed oils such as Jatropha, Pongamia, neem, Camelina, soapberries, and animal fats, along with low-cost technologies, were performed in attempts to reduce the cost of biodiesel and to commercialize its products in both developing and developed countries [126,127].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%