2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key factors influencing metal concentrations in sediments along Western European Rivers: A long-term monitoring study (1945–2020)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The abrupt increase in heavy metal concentrations following the year 2012 could indicate that the Nile Delta started the acceleration phase of its pollution in response to the extensive use of untreated agricultural drainage water and direct discharge of partially treated municipal and industrial wastewater. Similar trends of accelerated heavy metal pollution have been reported in the major rivers in Europe such as the downstream of the Thames between 1940 and 1963 (Vane et al., 2020), the downstream of the Seine, Rhône, and Garonne‐Lot River systems between 1960 and 1970 in response to increasing releases of urban industrial zones located upstream from the studied rivers (Dendievel et al., 2022). However, the lessons learned from long‐term data series in the above mentioned rivers as well as the Baltic Sea (Reusch et al., 2018) indicate that the contamination status in the Nile Delta system can reach a plateau and then recovery in a few years (Dendievel et al., 2022).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The abrupt increase in heavy metal concentrations following the year 2012 could indicate that the Nile Delta started the acceleration phase of its pollution in response to the extensive use of untreated agricultural drainage water and direct discharge of partially treated municipal and industrial wastewater. Similar trends of accelerated heavy metal pollution have been reported in the major rivers in Europe such as the downstream of the Thames between 1940 and 1963 (Vane et al., 2020), the downstream of the Seine, Rhône, and Garonne‐Lot River systems between 1960 and 1970 in response to increasing releases of urban industrial zones located upstream from the studied rivers (Dendievel et al., 2022). However, the lessons learned from long‐term data series in the above mentioned rivers as well as the Baltic Sea (Reusch et al., 2018) indicate that the contamination status in the Nile Delta system can reach a plateau and then recovery in a few years (Dendievel et al., 2022).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Therefore, SPM and sediment contamination appear to provide almost the same information about the contamination state of a water body, in terms of TrOC diversity. However, the more favourable organo-mineral properties of SPM imply higher levels of contamination, as previously observed for other contaminants (Dendievel et al, 2022), that may be easier to analyse and involve more consistent values for the evaluation of the chemical status.…”
Section: What Is the Most Representative Solid Matrix?mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The influence of seasonality on metal concentrations was evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) Test (α = 0.05) after homoscedasticity analysis. Kruskal–Wallis test (α = 0.05) was used to analyze the pairwise difference between MIs in sub-basins (upstream, midstream, and downstream) . The variance partitioning analysis (VPA) was used to determine the percentage impact of influential factors on trace metal pollution after z-score normalized data .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kruskal−Wallis test (α = 0.05) was used to analyze the pairwise difference between MIs in sub-basins (upstream, midstream, and downstream). 18 The variance partitioning analysis (VPA) was used to determine the percentage impact of influential factors on trace metal pollution after z-score normalized data. 71 The raw explained variation R 2 was adjusted during the analysis.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation