Key Elements of mHealth Interventions to Successfully Increase Physical Activity: Meta-Regression

Abstract

BackgroundMobile technology gives researchers unimagined opportunities to design new interventions to increase physical activity. Unfortunately, it is still unclear which elements are useful to initiate and maintain behavior change.ObjectiveIn this meta-analysis, we investigated randomized controlled trials of physical activity interventions that were delivered via mobile phone. We analyzed which elements contributed to intervention success.MethodsAfter searching four databases and science networks for eligible studies, we entered 50 studies with N=5997 participants into a random-effects meta-analysis, controlling for baseline group differences. We also calculated meta-regressions with the most frequently used behavior change techniques (behavioral goals, general information, self-monitoring, information on where and when, and instructions on how to) as moderators.ResultsWe found a small overall effect of the Hedges g=0.29, (95% CI 0.20 to 0.37) which reduced to g=0.22 after correcting for publication bias. In the moderator analyses, behavioral goals and self-monitoring each led to more intervention success. Interventions that used neither behavioral goals nor self-monitoring had a negligible effect of g=0.01, whereas utilizing either technique increased effectiveness by Δg=0.31, but combining them did not provide additional benefits (Δg=0.36).ConclusionsOverall, mHealth interventions to increase physical activity have a small to moderate effect. However, including behavioral goals or self-monitoring can lead to greater intervention success. More research is needed to look at more behavior change techniques and their interactions. Reporting interventions in trial registrations and articles need to be structured and thorough to gain accurate insights. This can be achieved by basing the design or reporting of interventions on taxonomies of behavior change.

The effectiveness of app‐based mobile interventions on nutrition behaviours and nutrition‐related health outcomes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…A comparison with other domains leads to similar conclusions. For example, a recent meta‐analysis in the domain of physical activity by Eckerstorfer et al found a small overall effect of Hedges' g = 0.29 (CI, 0.20‐0.37), which agrees with another recent meta‐analysis of m‐Health physical activity interventions …”

A qualitative exploration of cardiovascular disease patients’ views and experiences with an eHealth cardiac rehabilitation intervention: The PATHway Project

“…The PATHway components with the highest level of self-reported engagement were ExerClass, Screening and the Dashboard, each of these allowed for self-monitoring of physical activity and health related parameters, including blood pressure and heart rate and provided participants with feedback on these. Self-monitoring has been shown to be an effective tool in improving physical activity in CVD patients [ 17 ] and other populations [ 18 , 19 ]. With improvements in technology, self-monitoring of health status is becoming increasingly used in everyday life [ 20 ].…”

App-based supplemental exercise in rehabilitation, adherence, and effect on outcomes: a randomized controlled trial

“…Current research into the use of mHealth interventions for physical activity promotion in the general population suggests that those which incorporate behaviour change techniques (such as goal setting, self-monitoring of behaviour, social support, feedback on behaviour, prompts/cues and review of behaviour goals) have the greatest effect. 25,30,31,32 Integrating technologies has been recommended to increase the efficacy of mHealth interventions. 33,34,35,36 For example, a mHealth intervention with both tracking and texting components was able to increase physical activity but this effect was not observed when the tracking component was used alone.…”