IEDM Technical Digest. IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2004.1419114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key differences for process-induced uniaxial vs. substrate-induced biaxial stressed Si and Ge channel MOSFETs

Abstract: For both n and pMOSFETs, this paper confirms via controlled wafer bending experiments and physical modeling the superiority of uniaxial over biaxial stressed Si and Ge MOSFETs. For uniaxial stressed p-MOSFETs, valence band warping creates favorable in and out-of-plane conductivity effective masses resulting in significantly larger hole mobility enhancement at low strain and high vertical field. For process-induced uniaxial stressed n-MOSFETs, a significant performance advantage results from a smaller threshold… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
101
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Moreover, strained SOI ͑sSOI͒ has recently attracted a great deal of attention since it enables further performance improvements due to higher carrier mobility without device scaling while requiring only small changes in the device processing flow compared to SOI. 3,4 When scaling down the dimensions of metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor devices, ultrashallow contacts and extremely abrupt junctions between the source/drain electrodes and the channel are needed in order to suppress short channel effects. At the same time, the source/drain contacts must be highly doped to keep parasitic resistances as small as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Moreover, strained SOI ͑sSOI͒ has recently attracted a great deal of attention since it enables further performance improvements due to higher carrier mobility without device scaling while requiring only small changes in the device processing flow compared to SOI. 3,4 When scaling down the dimensions of metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor devices, ultrashallow contacts and extremely abrupt junctions between the source/drain electrodes and the channel are needed in order to suppress short channel effects. At the same time, the source/drain contacts must be highly doped to keep parasitic resistances as small as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In analogy with conventional semiconductors, appropriate biaxial stress, which can be obtained by growth on suitable latticemismatch substrates, are likely to produce increases in mobility for quantum confined two-dimensional electron gases. 16 We note that the fractional quantum Hall effect was discovered in a GaAs sample having a mobility of 90 000 cm 2 / V s. 17 The very large mobilities, exceeding 100 000 cm 2 / V s, demonstrated here, will expose lateral quantum transport such as quantum Hall effect and edge state transport in a d-band system. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that mobility depends on the effective mass of carriers, stress can directly affect device performance. 29,30 On the other hand, only a small performance reduction was observed in MOSFET devices after our CMOS-compatible peel-off process was performed, compared with the on-wafer devices (where the most significant impact is on gate leakage current) and at different applied strains (bending radii from 70 mm down to 5…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further details can be found in the corresponding author's previous work. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] The thinning process can be summarized as the anisotropic back-etching of a selected die through several steps of deep reactive ion etching (DRIE) to adequately reach the desired thickness. A detailed description of this process can also be found in our previous work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation