Key Concepts From Health Promotion Evaluations: What Psychology Needs to Know

Abstract

Competing perspectives and debates about the meaning of health promotion and the best ways to evaluate the effectiveness of initiatives that focus on enhancing wellness pervade the literature. Given the emergence of health promotion, the impetus for outcomes-based practice in psychology, and the push for evidence-based care in the health system (Thorogood & Coombes, 2000), demonstrations of value and effectiveness are fundamental to the sustainability of mental health promotion activities. Psychology (and counseling as a sub-set field) needs to place itself as a profession vital to the sustainability of wellness initiatives. This paper proposes that psychologists' awareness and understanding of six key concepts from health promotion evaluation are essential for advancing psychology as a profession and enhancing applied practice for wellness initiatives. The key concepts include: formative, process and outcome evaluations, the qualitative/quantitative debate, the ecological nature, the participatory approach, the focus on community and the underlying philosophies of empowerment and utilization. The use of key concepts from health promotion evaluation strategies support psychologists to a) deal with issues of major public health importance and b) collaborate with other disciplines for the benefit of the public (Sartorius, 1999). Finally, this paper makes recommendations to secure psychology's place as a vital contributor to 1 Whilst Psychology is the generic term used here to represent the broad field, counseling as a sub-set in the discipline is particularly relevant for the ideas and issues discussed. Rather than adding the sub-set qualifier each time the broad field is referred to, the reader in this context is encouraged to hold this perspective of the place of counseling in regard to psychology as they work through the materials presented.

Emotional Implications of Weight Stigma Across Middle School: The Role of Weight-Based Peer Discrimination

“…Many school-based health programs focus on fitness and may therefore narrow acceptable body size norms. Moreover, when health promotion programs underscore the importance of personal responsibility by promoting healthy eating habits and exercise (see Stice, Shaw, & Marti, 2006), they can further contribute to weight stigma—those who remain overweight may actually be blamed for their weight (e.g., Russell-Mayhew, 2006). Thus, programs that empower youth to take control of their health should also manage social implications of these messages (i.e., to prevent negative evaluations and the mistreatment of youth with heavy weight).…”

Reorientation to more health promotion in health services – a study of barriers and possibilities from the perspective of health professionals

“…Using psychologists as an example, Wahass argues that health promotion is a legitimate practice because psychologists are trained in the evaluation of human behaviors and play a major role in understanding how biological, behavioral, and social factors influence health and illness 27. Psychologists can help people modify their behaviors and lifestyles to prevent and recover from health problems 27,28. However, psychologists may have been too preoccupied with repairing damage rather than focusing on building strength and resilience 29…”

Half Full or Half Empty: The Measurement of Mental Health and Mental Illness in Emerging Australian Adults

“…If we hope to increase the implementation of mental health programs on a more widespread basis, clear targets (dependent on measures used) are needed to produce quantifiable, extensive and ongoing demonstration that such programs are effective (Kutash, Duchnowski, & Green, 2011;Russell-Mayhew, 2006;Weist, Nabors, Myers, & Paul, 2000;Weist et al, 2005). A lack of established measures that provide comprehensive information on the spectrum of population mental health and illness poses a major challenge to the health care system in terms of planning and allocating mental health resources and monitoring the effectiveness of mental health policies and programs (Tannenbaum, Lexchin, Tamblyn, & Romans, 2009).…”