2013
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/50/1a/06018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K1 of the air-kerma standards of the LNE–LNHB, France and the BIPM in60Co gamma radiation

Abstract: An indirect comparison of the standards for air kerma of the Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d'Essais -Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (LNE-LNHB), France and of the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) was carried out in the 60 Co radiation beam of the BIPM in April 2013. The comparison result, evaluated as a ratio of the LNE-LNHB and the BIPM standards for air kerma, is 0.9994 with a combined standard uncertainty of 1.8  10 -3 . The results are analysed and presented in terms of degree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of equivalence for entries in the BIPM key comparison data base in terms of air kerma and in terms of absorbed dose to water was established by linking the ratios as defined above to the BIPM.RI(I)-K1 and BIPM.RI(I)-K4 key comparisons respectively through laboratories having participated in one or both comparison exercises [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Thus, the linking factor Q(X)Lab i = R(X)Lab i, mean / R(X)Lab i, BIPM can be defined with R(X)Lab i, BIPM being the result from the corresponding CCRI(I) key comparison and (X) standing for either (KAir) or (DW).…”
Section: Metas Has Explored Different Ways To Analyze the Comparison ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The degree of equivalence for entries in the BIPM key comparison data base in terms of air kerma and in terms of absorbed dose to water was established by linking the ratios as defined above to the BIPM.RI(I)-K1 and BIPM.RI(I)-K4 key comparisons respectively through laboratories having participated in one or both comparison exercises [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Thus, the linking factor Q(X)Lab i = R(X)Lab i, mean / R(X)Lab i, BIPM can be defined with R(X)Lab i, BIPM being the result from the corresponding CCRI(I) key comparison and (X) standing for either (KAir) or (DW).…”
Section: Metas Has Explored Different Ways To Analyze the Comparison ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, following the BIPM.RI(I) comparison publications [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] a degree of equivalence linked to BIPM.RI(I)-K1 and BIPM.RI(I)-K4 among the actual calibration coefficient data N(X)Lab i may be calculated as "(N(X)Lab i / N(X)BIPM) -1" expressed in "mGyGy-1" (Table 7). Ideally, for the linking laboratories, the values of N(DW)Lab i / N(DW)BIPM should give the same results than those obtained during their comparison with the BIPM (R(X)Lab i, BIPM in Table 6).…”
Section: Degrees Of Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations