Kevelson’s Semiotics Today

Broekman, Jan M.; Fleerackers, Frank

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69520-4_5

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The erasure of their legislative identity by the political executive is remarkable, for it was not even discussed as something amiss in the political scheme of things. Participating in a discourse is passing on the signs and symbols and their intended meaning from one individual to the other—that’s what is called culture [ 45 ]. This meaning creation and the consequent creation of culture excludes the participation of marginalized, ignorant, and indifferent.…”

Section: Pandemic and The Dignity Of The Economically Underprivilegedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Of Semiotics, the Marginalised and Laws During the Lockdown in India

Tiwari

Parmar

2022

Int J Semiot Law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On 24th March 2020, the first nationwide complete lockdown was announced by the Prime Minister of India for 21 days which was later extended to 31st May 2020. Consequently, thousands of migrant workers placed in big cities had no other option but to go back to their native villages. Their journeys back to villages- thousands of kilometres on bicycles or foot due to the non-availability of public transport amidst the travel ban- were driven by the compulsions of food and shelter. In one of many heart-wrenching incidents, sixteen laborers were run over by a freight train (all passenger trains in the wake of lockdown had been halted) while they were resting on the railway tracks. The images of the Roti (Indian bread) on the railway track strewn across were beamed on the national news channels, as a telling commentary of the unimaginable hardships of these workers. Ironically, in the eyes of law, they were trespassers under the Indian Railways Act, 1989. The Indian Railway did not pay any compensation to the victims. Their act also violated the Indian Disaster Management Act, 2005 and Indian Penal Code, 1860- the law for the breach of lockdown guidelines and the law for disobedience of order by public servants respectively- for having decided to travel amidst a travel ban. The semiotics of law-making acts ‘criminal’ bereft of ‘moral culpability’ are seldom questioned on their supposed amoral foundations. Pandemic exhibited that social fissures not only condition the individual or community actions but also the actions of the State. Minorities especially Muslims were at the receiving end of State’s selective enforcement of lockdown laws in India. The various instances in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic expose the hollow claims of equality before the law and the equal protection of laws as a constitutional promise to every citizen. This article aims to unravel the ostensible and the actual moral exhibition of such Indian laws through the lens of several incidents during the nationwide lockdown in India. This paper would argue that this constructed positivist amorality needs to be deconstructed to unearth the power imbalance that it seeks to hide.

show abstract

Section: Pandemic and The Dignity Of The Economically Underprivilegedmentioning

confidence: 99%