“…However, despite this recommendation, in clinical drug interaction trials, a different length of preexposure of itraconazole in comparison with ketoconazole has to be used to generate maximum inhibition, which has already been discussed in the literature. 3 In addition, itraconazole is not as strong as ketoconazole regarding inhibition of CYP3A, with an average area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratio (AUCR) of 7.3 compared with an average of 11.5 for oral midazolam when ketoconazole is used. 4 The safety of healthy volunteers taking part in DDI trials is of paramount importance.…”
Numerous drug‐drug interaction (DDI) trials have to be conducted in healthy volunteers based on current regulatory guidelines. Because the worst‐case scenario of strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibitors has to be tested, the results and their validity have to be balanced with the risk to volunteer safety. The use of ketoconazole in clinical DDI studies has been discouraged by regulatory agencies due to an alleged risk of liver injury. In order to reduce the risk to healthy volunteers, we carried out a study with single‐day exposure to each of 6 perpetrator azole fungistatic drugs. They were evaluated regarding their CYP3A inhibition using microdosed midazolam and a limited sampling strategy. Ratios of areas under the concentration‐time curves ranged from 1.93 with isavuconazole to 8.42 with ketoconazole. The highest number of adverse events occurred with voriconazole, followed by ketoconazole; 2 dropouts occurred due to adverse events following itraconazole administration. Literature data on adverse events of azole fungistatic drugs in DDI trials are rare and inconclusive. Only in recent years with the newer drugs are they more precise and reliable. It can be concluded that the duration of preexposure of perpetrator drugs can be reduced to 1 hour before administration of the victim drug. This still can be sufficient to achieve the scientific objectives of the trial with the lowest possible risk.
“…However, despite this recommendation, in clinical drug interaction trials, a different length of preexposure of itraconazole in comparison with ketoconazole has to be used to generate maximum inhibition, which has already been discussed in the literature. 3 In addition, itraconazole is not as strong as ketoconazole regarding inhibition of CYP3A, with an average area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) ratio (AUCR) of 7.3 compared with an average of 11.5 for oral midazolam when ketoconazole is used. 4 The safety of healthy volunteers taking part in DDI trials is of paramount importance.…”
Numerous drug‐drug interaction (DDI) trials have to be conducted in healthy volunteers based on current regulatory guidelines. Because the worst‐case scenario of strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) inhibitors has to be tested, the results and their validity have to be balanced with the risk to volunteer safety. The use of ketoconazole in clinical DDI studies has been discouraged by regulatory agencies due to an alleged risk of liver injury. In order to reduce the risk to healthy volunteers, we carried out a study with single‐day exposure to each of 6 perpetrator azole fungistatic drugs. They were evaluated regarding their CYP3A inhibition using microdosed midazolam and a limited sampling strategy. Ratios of areas under the concentration‐time curves ranged from 1.93 with isavuconazole to 8.42 with ketoconazole. The highest number of adverse events occurred with voriconazole, followed by ketoconazole; 2 dropouts occurred due to adverse events following itraconazole administration. Literature data on adverse events of azole fungistatic drugs in DDI trials are rare and inconclusive. Only in recent years with the newer drugs are they more precise and reliable. It can be concluded that the duration of preexposure of perpetrator drugs can be reduced to 1 hour before administration of the victim drug. This still can be sufficient to achieve the scientific objectives of the trial with the lowest possible risk.
“…It is important to note that ketoconazole is no longer recommended by the FDA for use in drug‐drug interaction (DDI) studies, 15 although it was recommended at the time the present study was conducted 16 and had been safely used as the index strong inhibitor of CYP3A metabolism in DDI studies for many years 17,18 . Previous studies demonstrate that maximal inhibition of CYP3A activity is achieved using customary oral doses of ketoconazole as were administered in the present study 19–21 . Evaluation of biochemical evidence of liver injury associated with ketoconazole use in DDI studies done in healthy volunteers indicates no evidence of meaningful hepatotoxicity in this context 21–23 …”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…17,18 Previous studies demonstrate that maximal inhibition of CYP3A activity is achieved using customary oral doses of ketoconazole as were administered in the present study. [19][20][21] Evaluation of biochemical evidence of liver injury associated with ketoconazole use in DDI studies done in healthy volunteers indicates no evidence of meaningful hepatotoxicity in this context. [21][22][23]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] Evaluation of biochemical evidence of liver injury associated with ketoconazole use in DDI studies done in healthy volunteers indicates no evidence of meaningful hepatotoxicity in this context. [21][22][23]…”
Laquinimod, a neuroimmunomodulator, is extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, and modulations of CYP3A4 activity may lead to alterations in the pharmacokinetics and/or clinical effects of laquinimod. To determine the drug-drug interaction potential of laquinimod with CYP3A inhibitors and inducers, interaction assessments were conducted in healthy volunteers using single-dose administration of laquinimod before and after multiple dosing of CYP3A inhibitors (ketoconazole, fluconazole, and cimetidine) or a CYP3A4 inducer (rifampin). For ketoconazole, subjects (n = 14) received laquinimod 0.6 mg following 1 day of ketoconazole (400 mg daily) pretreatment, a single concomitant dose, and 28 additional days. For fluconazole, subjects (n = 14) received laquinimod 0.6 mg after a single fluconazole dose of 400 mg followed by 200-mg daily fluconazole administration for 20 additional days. For cimetidine, subjects (n = 14) received laquinimod 0.6 mg following 1 day of cimetidine (800 mg twice daily) pretreatment, a single concomitant dose, and 21 additional days. For rifampin, subjects (n = 14) received laquinimod 0.6 mg following 9 days of rifampin (600 mg daily) pretreatment, a single concomitant dose, and 12 additional days. Coadministration of laquinimod with CYP3A inhibitors, ketoconazole, fluconazole, and cimetidine increased laquinimod area under the plasma concentrationtime curve from time zero to infinity by approximately 3.1-,2.5-,and 1.1-fold,respectively.Coadministration of laquinimod with rifampin decreased laquinimod area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity by 5-fold. These results indicate that coadministration of laquinimod with moderate to strong inhibitors of CYP3A or strong inducers of CYP3A may give rise to significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions.
“…Drug interaction studies with ketoconazole, a known inhibitor of CYP4F2, 7,8 have been discouraged by US and European regulatory authorities due to hepatic safety concerns in healthy volunteers. While recent reviews have questioned the hepatic safety risk for ketoconazole use in drug interaction studies, 9,10 due to the regulatory concerns on ketoconazole use and no other established CYP4F2 inhibitor available, drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies evaluating CYP4F2 substrates as victims are challenging.…”
Smallpox was eradicated in 1980 but remains a biothreat due to the potential release of variola virus into the general population. Brincidofovir, the second medicine approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat smallpox, is metabolized by oxidative and hydrolytic pathways. The oxidative pathway is initiated by cytochrome P450 4F2 (CYP4F2), an enzyme lacking clinical probes for drug interaction studies. The aim of this work was to assess the impact of reduced activity CYP4F2 variants (rs2108622, C/T and T/T) on brincidofovir pharmacokinetics as a surrogate for drug inhibition.Genotyping was performed on blood from healthy participants receiving oral (n = 261) and intravenous (IV, n = 49) brincidofovir across 6 phase 1 trials. Plasma concentrations were measured by validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods.After oral administration, subjects with the lowest activity CYP4F2 genotype (T/T) had up to 36% higher AUCinf and 29% higher Cmax while subjects with the moderate activity CYP4F2 genotype (C/T) had similar Cmax and AUCinf compared to those with the wild‐type genotype. Little to no increase in brincidofovir exposure parameters was observed following IV administration.Based on the lack of significant increases in brincidofovir plasma concentrations in subjects with low activity CYP4F2, a clinically meaningful drug–drug interaction is not expected with CYP4F2 inhibitor and brincidofovir coadministration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.