1985
DOI: 10.1097/00005344-198500077-00036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ketanserin and α1-Adrenergic Antagonism in Humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1987
1987
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, whereas heart rate is usually unchanged during longterm prazosin therapy (Lund-Johansen, 1974), in this and other studies heart rate was significantly reduced with ketanserin (Fagard et al, 1985;Persson etal., 1983). A previous study, which demonstrated weak a-adrenoceptor blocking activity in normotensive subjects, found no reduction in blood pressure (Zabludowski et al, 1985) and the evidence of only modest aadrenoceptor antagonist activity in this study also suggests that this mechanism is unlikely to account entirely for the antihypertensive effect. There is some dispute about the extent of the reduction in peripheral vascular resistance associated with the antihypertensive effect of ketanserin (Fagard et al, 1984;Omvik & Lund-Johansen, 1983) and in this study ketanserin had no effect on the pressor responses to angiotensin II.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Furthermore, whereas heart rate is usually unchanged during longterm prazosin therapy (Lund-Johansen, 1974), in this and other studies heart rate was significantly reduced with ketanserin (Fagard et al, 1985;Persson etal., 1983). A previous study, which demonstrated weak a-adrenoceptor blocking activity in normotensive subjects, found no reduction in blood pressure (Zabludowski et al, 1985) and the evidence of only modest aadrenoceptor antagonist activity in this study also suggests that this mechanism is unlikely to account entirely for the antihypertensive effect. There is some dispute about the extent of the reduction in peripheral vascular resistance associated with the antihypertensive effect of ketanserin (Fagard et al, 1984;Omvik & Lund-Johansen, 1983) and in this study ketanserin had no effect on the pressor responses to angiotensin II.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…1983; 28753, Correspondence). With chronic treatment (or prolonged infusion), or with high intravenous doses, ketanserin (unlike the al-antagonist prazosin) causes a nonparallel rightward shift in dose-response curves to methoxamine and norepinephrine in hypertensive patients (18)(19)(20). This could be due to aladrenergic blockade but also to an altered wall-to-lumen ratio following reduction in blood pressure by other mechanisms (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With chronic treatment (or prolonged infusion), or with high intravenous doses, ketanserin (unlike the al-antagonist prazosin) causes a nonparallel rightward shift in dose-response curves to methoxamine and norepinephrine in hypertensive patients (18)(19)(20). This could be due to aladrenergic blockade but also to an altered wall-to-lumen ratio following reduction in blood pressure by other mechanisms (20). By contrast, during acute administration of ketanserin at lower doses, al-blockade does not appear to contribute to the acute antihypertensive effect of ketanserin (18)(19)(20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several studies it has been suggested that the antihypertensive activity ofketanserin may be attributed to the al-adrenergic receptor blocking properties of the compound [37,38] or to a centrally mediated inhibition of sympathetic vascular tone [39,40]. Although the involvement of al-adrenergic receptor blockade cannot be excluded, it is rather unlikely that this is the sole mechanism involved, because ketanserin also lowers arterial blood pressure in patients with complete autonomic insufficiency [41].…”
Section: The Interaction Between Al-adrenergic and S2-serotonergic Rementioning
confidence: 99%