2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2015.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kernel regression in mixed feature spaces for spatio-temporal saliency detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since combining saliency maps from different features is a very important component in visual attention, various approaches have been proposed in previous work [4][5][6]11]. The most commonly used ones include multiplicative fusion [11], maximum fusion [28], and additive fusion [1,4,14,21]. Thereinto, multiplicative fusion emphasizes that only when all responses at a certain location are high in each saliency map, could it be regarded as a salient point.…”
Section: Mutual Consistency-guided Spatial Saliency Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since combining saliency maps from different features is a very important component in visual attention, various approaches have been proposed in previous work [4][5][6]11]. The most commonly used ones include multiplicative fusion [11], maximum fusion [28], and additive fusion [1,4,14,21]. Thereinto, multiplicative fusion emphasizes that only when all responses at a certain location are high in each saliency map, could it be regarded as a salient point.…”
Section: Mutual Consistency-guided Spatial Saliency Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we evaluate the effect of our mutual consistency-guided spatial saliency map generation scheme, and also compare it with four state-of-the art fusion methods, i.e., multiplicative fusion [11], maximum fusion [28], additive fusion using fixed weights [33], and additive fusion based on variance [14]. For the fixed weights-based additive fusion method, the weights for LC-SM and C-SM are set as w L ¼ w C ¼ 0:5.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Mutual Consistency-guided Spatial Saliency Genmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However it is not easy to get this job done because of the loss of much original information. In the computer vision field, salient object detection is becoming one of the mainstream generic object detection methods [ 24 , 25 ]. The key idea is to build the saliency map using local contrast.…”
Section: Gradient Textural Saliency Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although greedy metric fusion can utilize multiple features to calculate the similarity between images, its use would be not ideal when the super feature vectors in Equation (2) are highly hybrid [26]. Accordingly, how to fully incorporate the merit of multiple features for measuring the affinity between two images deserves more explanation.…”
Section: Greedy Affinity Metric Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%