2017
DOI: 10.1002/minf.201700053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kernel Multitask Regression for Toxicogenetics

Abstract: The development of high-throughput in vitro assays to study quantitatively the toxicity of chemical compounds on genetically characterized human-derived cell lines paves the way to predictive toxicogenetics, where one would be able to predict the toxicity of any particular compound on any particular individual. In this paper we present a machine learning-based approach for that purpose, kernel multitask regression (KMR), which combines chemical characterizations of molecular compounds with genetic and transcri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We follow here a similar procedure with the difference that our task here is a regression task. A similar approach was carried out also in protein-ligand interaction prediction (Jacob and Vert, 2008) and in compound toxicity prediction (Bernard et al, 2017).…”
Section: Base Regressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow here a similar procedure with the difference that our task here is a regression task. A similar approach was carried out also in protein-ligand interaction prediction (Jacob and Vert, 2008) and in compound toxicity prediction (Bernard et al, 2017).…”
Section: Base Regressorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous ML-based techniques have been employed in these approaches ( Adam et al, 2020 ). Neural network models ( Xia et al, 2021 ) and Bayesian multitask multiple kernel learning ( Bernard et al, 2017 ; Manica et al, 2019 ) are some of these methods. Others are random forests (RF) ( Gayvert et al, 2017 ), support vector machines (SVMs) ( Huang et al, 2017 ), and naïve Bayes ( Kang et al, 2018 ; Anagaw & Chang, 2019 ; Patel et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waegeman et al (2019) for overview). These include pairwise (kernel) learning (Ben-Hur and Noble 2005;Park and Chu 2009;Cichonska et al 2017Cichonska et al , 2018, dyadic prediction (Menon and Elkan 2010;Pahikkala et al 2014;Schäfer and Hüllermeier 2015), pair-input prediction (Park and Marcotte 2012), graph inference (Vert et al 2007), link prediction (Pieter and Koller 2005;Kashima et al 2009a), relational learning (Pahikkala et al 2010;Waegeman et al 2012;Pahikkala et al 2013), multi-task (Bonilla et al 2007;Bernard et al 2017) and as a special case zero-shot (Romera-Paredes and Torr 2015) learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%