2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.03950
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kernel Methods for Multistage Causal Inference: Mediation Analysis and Dynamic Treatment Effects

Abstract: We propose kernel ridge regression estimators for mediation analysis and dynamic treatment effects over short horizons. We allow treatments, covariates, and mediators to be discrete or continuous, and low, high, or infinite dimensional. We propose estimators of means, increments, and distributions of counterfactual outcomes with closed form solutions in terms of kernel matrix operations. For the continuous treatment case, we prove uniform consistency with finite sample rates. For the discrete treatment case, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24] present an RKHS estimator for distributional ATT and ATE with binary treatment. The present work more closely relates to works that incorporate kernel ridge regression into treatment effect, dose response, and counterfactual distribution estimation in static [36], proximal [32], dynamic [37], and missing-at-random settings [34]. I prove equally strong results despite additional complexity in the chain of causal influence and in the scope for nonlinearity due to data fusion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…[24] present an RKHS estimator for distributional ATT and ATE with binary treatment. The present work more closely relates to works that incorporate kernel ridge regression into treatment effect, dose response, and counterfactual distribution estimation in static [36], proximal [32], dynamic [37], and missing-at-random settings [34]. I prove equally strong results despite additional complexity in the chain of causal influence and in the scope for nonlinearity due to data fusion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Second, multiple robustness is with respect to ν 0 rather than the conditional density f (m|G = 0, x, d). The technique of sequential mean embeddings permits estimation of ν 0 without estimation of f (m|d, x) [37]. Third, the objects are all feasible in the sense that the treatment only appears for the experimental subpopulation (G = 0) and the outcome only appears for the observational subpopulation (G = 1).…”
Section: If In Addition Assumption 32 Holds Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations