1998
DOI: 10.1080/03610929808832217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kernel density estimation using weighted data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another extensions using Fourier series have been proposed in Jones and Karunamuni (1997). Later a third non-parametric estimator has been considered in Guillamón et al (1998). Density estimation for weighted data has also been studied from other points of view, Barmi and Simonoff (2000) proposed a simple transformation-based approach motivated by the form of the non-parametric maximun likelihood estimator of the density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another extensions using Fourier series have been proposed in Jones and Karunamuni (1997). Later a third non-parametric estimator has been considered in Guillamón et al (1998). Density estimation for weighted data has also been studied from other points of view, Barmi and Simonoff (2000) proposed a simple transformation-based approach motivated by the form of the non-parametric maximun likelihood estimator of the density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones (1991) demonstrated good properties of the estimate compared to an earlier proposal of Bhattacharyya, Franklin and Richardson (1988). Further discussion of kernel-type estimation for weighted distributions can be found in Richardson, Kazempour and Bhattacharyya (1991); Ahmad (1995); Wu and Mao (1996); Wu (1997a,b) and Guillamon, Navarro and Ruiz (1998).…”
Section: Smoother Density Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When h = 1, this corresponds to ordinary kernel density estimation. When h > 1, the observed spikes differ in their weights, requiring a weighted kernel density estimate to be computed (Guillamón et al, 1998). In either case, this permits rapid approximation of the corresponding GCV scores: When values of h, h r , and h s are selected based on optimizing box kernel estimates rather than ARRIS estimates, they respond to the same general features of the data that ARRIS would respond to.…”
Section: Rapid Evaluation Of Hmentioning
confidence: 99%