1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00443752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Keratinophilic fungi from soil of Tarragona, Catalunya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Keratinophilic fungi and their distribution has been reported from Chile (Caretta and Piontalli, 1977); Kenya (Muhammed and Lalji, 1978); Rome (Mercantini et al, 1980); Tarragona (Guarro et al, 1981); Egypt (Abdel-Fattah etal., 1982);and Canada (Singler et al, 1987). Such fungi from Indian soils gi in bottom sand of river Ganga (Awasthi and Shukla, 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Keratinophilic fungi and their distribution has been reported from Chile (Caretta and Piontalli, 1977); Kenya (Muhammed and Lalji, 1978); Rome (Mercantini et al, 1980); Tarragona (Guarro et al, 1981); Egypt (Abdel-Fattah etal., 1982);and Canada (Singler et al, 1987). Such fungi from Indian soils gi in bottom sand of river Ganga (Awasthi and Shukla, 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Compared to C. indicum, C. tropicum Carmichael has a wider global distribution (1)(2)(3)(4)10,14,18,20,30,33). The two along with M. gypseum appeared to be good keratinophiliccompetiters as was indicated by their growth on all the substrates in primary soil cultures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Isolation of some dermatophytes from soil has aroused agood deal of interest in the soil keratinophilic fungi during the last two decades. Recently, work on the distribution of such fungi has been carried out in Egypt (l), Chile (11), Tarragona (20), Rome (221, Lyon's region (23), Kenya (25) and Poland (34). Studies on keratinophilicfungi in India started in 1955 when Dey (18,21,26,27,30,33,37).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Arthrodermataceae and Onygenaceae, the Gymnoascaceae lack the enzymatic capability to break down keratin (Ulfig et al 1998;Scott and Untereiner 2004). Some are regarded as "keratinophilic" (Guarro et al 1981;Caretta et al 1992;Cugnani 2000;Filipello Marchisio 2000;Toro et al 2007), with a simply affinity for keratinous substrates, such as epidermis and its horny products, of which they utilise non-keratinous substances from the early degradation stages (Filipello Marchisio 2000;Blyskal 2009). Some are mildly cellulolytic (Howard 2002), whereas for others a chitinolytic activity has been hypothesised (Orr 1977;Lumley and Currah 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%